januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0018_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 janvier 2026.#NOVIS Insurance Company, NOVIS Versicherungsgesellschaft, NOVIS Compagnia di Assicurazioni, NOVIS Poisťovňa a.s. contre Česká národní banka.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement et libre prestation des services – Marché unique de l’assurance – Directive 2009/138/CE – Principe du contrôle par l’État membre d’origine – Article 155 – Compétences des autorités de contrôle de l’État membre d’accueil – Coopération avec les autorités de l’État membre d’origine – Entreprise d’assurance ne se conformant pas aux dispositions légales applicables dans l’État membre d’accueil – Dispositions concernées – Règlement (UE) no 1286/2014 – Produits d’investissement packagés de détail et fondés sur l’assurance – This document does not exist in English.
marec 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0020: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of providing payment.#Case C-20/24.
maj 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0020_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of providing payment.#Case C-20/24.
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0021: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0021_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#CP contre Nissan Iberia SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 101 TFUE – Principe d’effectivité – Actions en dommages et intérêts pour les infractions aux dispositions du droit de la concurrence des États membres et de l’Union européenne – Délai de prescription – Détermination du dies a quo – Connaissance des informations indispensables pour l’introduction de l’action en dommages et intérêts – Publication sur le site Internet d’une autorité nationale de concurrence de sa décision constatant une infraction aux règles de concurrence – Effet contraignant d’une décision d’une autorité nationale de concurrence non encore définitive – Suspension ou interruption du délai de prescription – Suspension de la procé This document does not exist in English.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0032: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#OA v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials – EU pension scheme – Article 77, third subparagraph – Scope of application – Accredited parliamentary assistant who has spent his entire professional career in the European Parliament – Interpretation consistent with the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-32/24 P.
december 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0034: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd and Apple Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Determination of the territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State – Place where the harmful event occurred – Place where the damage occurred – Representative action seeking compensation for the damage caused by anticompetitive conduct consisting of the charging by the operat
december 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0034_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025.#Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd and Apple Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Determination of the territorial jurisdiction of a court of a Member State – Place where the harmful event occurred – Place where the damage occurred – Representative action seeking compensation for the damage caused by anticompetitive conduct consisting of the charging by the operator of an online platform, aimed at all users in a Member St
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0037: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Collective management of copyright and related rights – Directive 2006/115/EEC – Article 8(2) – Broadcasting and communication to the public – Directive 2014/26/EU – Second subparagraph of Article 16(2) – Licensing – Radio broadcasting – Concepts of ‘equitable remuneration’ and ‘appropriate remuneration’ – Criteria for assessing the equitable or appropriate nature – Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fundamental right to the protection of intellectual p
december 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0037_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Collective management of copyright and related rights – Directive 2006/115/EEC – Article 8(2) – Broadcasting and communication to the public – Directive 2014/26/EU – Second subparagraph of Article 16(2) – Licensing – Radio broadcasting – Concepts of ‘equitable remuneration’ and ‘appropriate remuneration’ – Criteria for assessing the equitable or appropriate nature – Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of th