Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0058: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#NE and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 12 – System of strict protection for certain animal species – Article 16 – Decision to grant a derogation in anticipation of a planning permission application for a project covered by Directive 2011/92/EU – Article 11 – Aarhus Convention – Article 9 – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Derogation decision classified as an autonomous legal act – Procedural rules providing for a three-month period for seeking the annulment of a derogation licence.#Case C-58/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0058_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#NE and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 12 – System of strict protection for certain animal species – Article 16 – Decision to grant a derogation in anticipation of a planning permission application for a project covered by Directive 2011/92/EU – Article 11 – Aarhus Convention – Article 9 – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Derogation decision classified as an autonomous legal act – Procedural rules providing for a three-month period for seeking the annulment of a derogation licence.#Case C-58/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0059: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – State measure extending gambling licences granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections – Rejection of a complaint – No examination of the existence of a potential indirect advantage – Scope of the Commission’s duty to carry out an examination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0059_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – State measure extending gambling licences granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections – Rejection of a complaint – No examination of the existence of a potential indirect advantage – Scope of the Commission’s duty to carry out an examination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0061: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#DL v PQ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation – Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 – Article 8(a) and (b) – Concept of ‘habitual residence’ of the spouses – Status of diplomatic agent of one of the spouses – Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.#Case C-61/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0061_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#DL v PQ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation – Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 – Article 8(a) and (b) – Concept of ‘habitual residence’ of the spouses – Status of diplomatic agent of one of the spouses – Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.#Case C-61/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0063: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12(2)(b) – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Exclusion from being a refugee – Grounds – Commission of a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his or her admission as a refugee – Effect of the fact that the sentence has been served.#Case C-63/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0063_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12(2)(b) – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Exclusion from being a refugee – Grounds – Commission of a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his or her admission as a refugee – Effect of the fact that the sentence has been served.#Case C-63/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0067: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#R. K. v K. Ch. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Maintenance allowances set by a decision of a court of a third State – Maintenance creditors residing in that third State and holding either the nationality of that third State alone or the nationality of that third State and of a Member State – Maintenance debtor, a national of that Member State and habitually resident in that Member State – Application to modify that decision made by that maintenance debtor to a court of that Member State – Determination of the court with jurisdictio

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0067_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#R. K. v K. Ch. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Maintenance allowances set by a decision of a court of a third State – Maintenance creditors residing in that third State and holding either the nationality of that third State alone or the nationality of that third State and of a Member State – Maintenance debtor, a national of that Member State and habitually resident in that Member State – Application to modify that decision made by that maintenance debtor to a cour

RSS
First25682569257025712573257525762577Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top