marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0084_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#UAB „EM SYSTEM“ contre AB SEB bankas et AS „Citadele banka“ Lietuvos filialas.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Règlement (CE) no 765/2006 – Mesures restrictives en raison de la situation en Biélorussie – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Annexe I – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes faisant l’objet de mesures restrictives – Inscription du nom de l’actionnaire d’une société sur cette liste – Détention de 50 % du capital de cette société par cet actionnaire – Gel des fonds de la société qui n’est pas inscrite sur la liste – Contrôle par une personne ou une entité qui est inscrite sur la liste d’une personne morale qui n’est pas inscrite sur la liste – Critères d’ap This document does not exist in English.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0085: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v BAWAG P.S.K. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property – Directive 2014/17/EU – Article 13(1)(g) – General information on home loan products – Obligation to provide a ‘representative example’ – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 7 – Banking institution offering different variants of loans – Information sheet including only examples of variable rate credit agreements.#Case C-85/24.
oktober 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0086: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#CS STEEL a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Determination of origin of goods – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System – Tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, seamless, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel – Validity of the rule of origin applicable to steel pipes – Hot-finished pipes, subsequently cold-reduced.#Case C-86/24.
december 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0086_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#CS STEEL a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě – pobočka v Olomouci.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Determination of origin of goods – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System – Tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, seamless, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel – Validity of the rule of origin applicable to steel pipes – Hot-finished pipes, subsequently cold-reduced.#Case C-86/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0087: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 octobre 2025.#AS „Gaso” et AS „Conexus Baltic Grid” contre Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Gaz naturel – Directive 2009/73/CE – Article 41, paragraphe 8 – Notion de “mesures incitatives appropriées” – Règlement (CE) no 715/2009 – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “rendement approprié des investissements” – Réseaux de transport et de distribution – Installation de stockage – Critères à prendre en compte pour l’établissement des tarifs de transport et de distribution fixés par l’autorité de régulation nationale – Taux de rendement du capital – Obligation d’interprétation conforme – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-87/24. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0087_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#AS „Gaso” and AS „Conexus Baltic Grid” v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 41(8) – Concept of an ‘appropriate incentive’ – Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 – Article 13(1) – Concept of an ‘appropriate return on investments’ – Transmission and distribution networks – Storage facility – Criteria to be taken into account for setting natural gas transmission and distribution tariffs fixed by the national regulatory authority – Rate of return on capital – Obligation of consistent interpretation – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-87/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0092: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate - Direzione Regionale della Lombardia.#References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50% of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax.#Joined Cases C-92/24 and C-93/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0092_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate - Direzione Regionale della Lombardia.#References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50% of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax.#Joined Cases C-92/24 and C-93/24.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0095: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#ATAU v Procura generale presso la Corte d’appello di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution – Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction –
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0095_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 21 mai 2026.#ATAU contre Procura generale presso la Corte d’appello di Napoli.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision‑cadre 2002/584/JAI – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Procédure de remise entre États membres – Motifs facultatifs de non-exécution – Article 4, point 6 – Engagement de l’État membre d’exécution à exécuter la peine conformément à son droit interne – Décision‑cadre 2008/909/JAI – Reconnaissance mutuelle des jugements en matière pénale prononçant des peines ou des mesures privatives de liberté – Motifs de non-reconnaissance et de non-exécution – Article 9, paragraphe 1, sous i) – Intéressé n’ayant pas comparu en personne au procès ayant mené à sa condamnation – Information qua This document does not exist in English.