december 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0003: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 December 2024.#SIA „MISTRAL TRANS” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Scope – Article 2(1)(3)(a) – Obliged entity – Concept of ‘external accountants’ – Accounting services provided, on an ancillary basis, to companies related to the entity providing them.#Case C-3/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0004: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 69(1) – Article 70(1) – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Article 7(1) to (3) – Sums paid as collateral backing irrevocable payment commitments – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) refusing to return the sums paid.#Case C-4/24 P.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0004_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 69(1) – Article 70(1) – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Article 7(1) to (3) – Sums paid as collateral backing irrevocable payment commitments – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) refusing to return the sums paid.#Case C-4/24 P.
september 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0005: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#P.M. v S. Snc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2 – Discrimination based on disability – Dismissal of a worker on sick leave – National legislation laying down the same limit of number of days of sick leave per calendar year for all workers in the same sector of activity – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation.#Case C-5/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0005_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#P.M. v S. Snc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2 – Discrimination based on disability – Dismissal of a worker on sick leave – National legislation laying down the same limit of number of days of sick leave per calendar year for all workers in the same sector of activity – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation.#Case C-5/24.
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0006: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Abanca Corporación Bancaria, SA v WE and VX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer credit agreements – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Acceleration clause – Judicial review – No national legislation governing the acceleration clause – Criteria for assessing unfairness.#Joined Cases C-6/24 and C-231/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0006_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Abanca Corporación Bancaria, SA v WE and VX.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de La Coruña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer credit agreements – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Acceleration clause – Judicial review – No national legislation governing the acceleration clause – Criteria for assessing unfairness.#Joined Cases C-6/24 and C-231/24.
junij 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0007: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 12 juin 2025.#Deutsche Rentenversicherung Nord et BG Verkehr contre Gjensidige Forsikring, filiale danoise de Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norvège en tant que représentant de Marius Pedersen A/S et Gjensidige Forsikring, filiale danoise de Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norvège.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Coordination des systèmes de sécurité sociale – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 85, paragraphe 1 – Prestations dues en vertu de la législation d’un État membre pour des dommages survenus sur le territoire d’un autre État membre – Droit de recours des institutions débitrices contre le tiers responsable – Droits détenus par la victime – Subrogation – Limites.#Affaire C-7/24. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0007_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#Deutsche Rentenversicherung Nord and BG Verkehr v Gjensidige Forsikring, filiale danoise de Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norvège en tant que représentant de Marius Pedersen A/S and Gjensidige Forsikring, filiale danoise de Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norvège.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Svendborg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 85(1) – Benefits payable under the legislation of a Member State for injury sustained in the territory of another Member State – Right of action of the institutions responsible for providing benefits against a liable third party – Rights of the injur
marec 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0008: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-ex