Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0742: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others v L.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 15(1) – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection – Refusal of a request to access the labour market – Reason for the refusal – Delay in the processing of the application for international protection attributable in part to the applicant.#Case C-742/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0743: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Minister for Justice and Equality v MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for criminal prosecution – Risk of breach of a fundamental right – Second sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Changes, to the detriment of the sentenced person, to the licence regime.#Case C-743/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0743_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Minister for Justice and Equality v MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for criminal prosecution – Risk of breach of a fundamental right – Second sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Changes, to the detriment of the sentenced person, to the licence regime.#Case C-743/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0746: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Bank Millennium S.A. v PR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Action brought by a seller or supplier for restitution of the loan capital paid under an agreement declared invalid – Rules on the award of costs – Different methods of calculating court costs according to the status of the applicant – Principle of effectiveness – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-746/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0746_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Bank Millennium S.A. v PR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Action brought by a seller or supplier for restitution of the loan capital paid under an agreement declared invalid – Rules on the award of costs – Different methods of calculating court costs according to the status of the applicant – Principle of effectiveness – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-746/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0757: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#SG v Gemeinde Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory.#Case C-757/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0758:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Große Kammer) vom 1. August 2025.#LC gegen Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Asylpolitik – Richtlinie 2013/32/EU – Gemeinsame Verfahren für die Zuerkennung und Aberkennung des internationalen Schutzes – Art. 36 und 37 – Begriff ‚sicherer Herkunftsstaat‘ – Bestimmung durch einen Gesetzgebungsakt – Anhang I – Kriterien – Art. 46 – Recht auf einen wirksamen Rechtsbehelf – Art. 47 der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Gerichtliche Prüfung der nationalen Bestimmung eines Drittstaats als sicherer Herkunftsstaat – Offenlegung der Informationsquellen, auf die diese Entscheidung gestützt ist.#Rechtssache C-75

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0758_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 1er août 2025.#LC contre Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile – Directive 2013/32/UE – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Articles 36 et 37 – Notion de “pays d’origine sûr” – Désignation au moyen d’un acte législatif – Annexe I – Critères – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Examen, par le juge, de la désignation par un État membre d’un pays tiers comme pays d’origine sûr – Publicité des sources d’information sur lesquelles cette décision est fondée.#Affaire C-758/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#mBank S.A. v ML.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Contract declared void – Action brought by a seller or supplier seeking restitution of the amount of the loan paid under a contract which is to be annulled – Consequences of the submission of a declaration of set-off – Implied waiver of the objection that the action is time-barred – Effective exercise of the procedural rights of consumers – Principle of effectiveness – Dissuasive effect of the prohibition on unfair terms.#Case C-767/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0770: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#DB InfraGO AG and DB RegioNetz Infrastruktur GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EC – Railway infrastructure – Management independence – Article 4(2) – Independence of the infrastructure manager – Infrastructure and services charges – Article 29(1) – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Charging scheme for charges for the use of the German railway infrastructure – Short-distance rail passenger transport – Calculation of the amount of the charges – Multiplication of the amount of the average charges levied during a reference period by a fixed annual rate of increase laid down by law.#Case C-770/24.

RSS
First25262527252825292531253325342535Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top