januar 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0588: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of under
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Almirall BV and Almirall SA v Infinity Pharma BV and Pharmaline BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Scope – Article 2(1) – Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process – Article 3(2) – Medicinal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to the patients served by the pharmacy in question – Exclusion from the directive’s scope – National regulation subjecting the latter medicinal products to an authorisation requirement on the basis of a numerical criterion.#Case C-589/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Almirall BV et Almirall SA contre Infinity Pharma BV et Pharmaline BV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Médicaments à usage humain – Directive 2001/83/CE – Champ d’application – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Médicaments préparés industriellement ou fabriqués selon une méthode dans laquelle intervient un processus industriel – Article 3, point 2 – Médicaments préparés en pharmacie selon les indications d’une pharmacopée et destinés à être délivrés directement aux patients approvisionnés par cette pharmacie – Exclusion du champ d’application – Réglementation nationale soumettant ces derniers médicaments à une obligation d’autorisation en fonction d’un critère numérique.#Affaire C-589/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0590: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Criminal nature of the penalty – Predictability and proportionality of that penalty – Principle of legal certaint
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0597: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#C.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Article 2(2) – Right of a teacher with a disability to be transferred to a particular territorial area – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities – Priority for mobility within a territorial area as compared to mobility between different territorial areas.#Case C-597/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0602: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W. v W. sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union – Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-602/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0602_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union – Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutralit
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0613: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Manquement d’État – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Faune et flore sauvages – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 4 – Annexes I et II – Sites d’importance communautaire – Zones spéciales de conservation – Absence de désignation – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Mesures de conservation nécessaires – Absence d’adoption – Inexécution de l’arrêt de la Cour – Sanctions pécuniaires – Somme forfaitaire – Astreinte.#Affaire C-613/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0615: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Ambito territoriale di caccia Ancona 2 v Azienda Agricola Camarzano di RK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agricultural sector – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – De minimis aid – Monitoring – Member State providing for the grant and the payment of de minimis aid without requiring a specific declaration from the applicant undertaking as to the amount and nature of any other State aid received during a period of three fiscal years – Production of self-certification relating to such aid.#Case C-615/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0617: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 24(d) and Article 211(2) – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Power to ‘supplement’ a legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 172(1) and (2) – Validity – Retroactive effect of an inward processing authorisation.#Case C-617/24.