december 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1136: Case T-1136/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Lianopoulou v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Claim for the restoration of the career path and claim for damages – Rejection – Notification by email – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Out of time – Inadmissibility)
februar 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1142: Case T-1142/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (ENEDO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ENEDO – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1143: Case T-1143/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1144: Case T-1144/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
januar 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1146: Case T-1146/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – W.L. Gore & Associates v EUIPO – Angiokard med. Spritzguß (Cardioflow) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow – Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
december 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1148: Case T-1148/23: Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2025 – PAN Europe v Commission (Plant protection products – Detailed rules for the identification of unacceptable co-formulants in plant protection products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/574 – Refusal of the request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Scrutiny of co-formulants – Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)
februar 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1150: Case T-1150/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2024 – Apoio XXI – Centro de Apoio Psico-Pedagógico v EUDA (Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Coordination and provision of interpreting services – Most economically advantageous tender – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Technical and professional capacity – Minimum capacity level – Selection criteria – Minimum requirements – Comparability of tenders – Price – Quality – Award criteria)
junij 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1153: Case T-1153/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2025 – Ghiassi v EUIPO – Hersill (VITAE) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VITAE – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
junij 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1154: Case T-1154/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Taxolutions v EUIPO – Haufe-Lexware (TAXMARC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA1158: Case T-1158/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – deluxe holding v EUIPO – Piffany Copenhagen (Electric candles) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing electric candles – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)