Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0230_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Constructed normal value – Product control number – Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the normal value and the export price – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Currency conversion – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law.#Case T-230/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0231_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and Others v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-231/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0239: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NERO CHAMPAGNE – Earlier PDO ‘Champagne’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Trade mark that contains a PDO – Products complying with the product specification of the PDO – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-239/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0239_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NERO CHAMPAGNE – Earlier PDO ‘Champagne’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Trade mark that contains a PDO – Products complying with the product specification of the PDO – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-239/23.

RSS
First22692270227122722274227622772278Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top