december 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0708_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-708/23 P.
julij 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0709: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-709/23 P.
december 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0709_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-709/23 P.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0724: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA AE v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 3(1) – Calculation of the amount of excise duty levied on beer – Method of calculating degrees Plato – Legislative amendment intended to clarify that method – Directive (EU) 2020/1151 – Article 1(1) – No effect of that directive on previously existing situations.#Case C-724/23.
julij 17, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0732: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2024.#Rǎzvan-Eugen Nicolescu and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Absence of the required unanimity – Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-732/23 P.
februar 03, 2026 0 9 CELEX:62023CO0743: Berichtigungsbeschluss vom 27. Januar 2026.#A gegen GKV-Spitzenverband.#Urteilsberichtigung.#Rechtssache C-743/23. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0761: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#N.V.N. contre Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2011/98/UE – Délivrance d’un permis unique autorisant les ressortissants de pays tiers à résider et à travailler sur le territoire d’un État membre – Principe d’équivalence – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Informations classifiées – Accès au dossier.#Affaire C-761/23. This document does not exist in English.
julij 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0763: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 25 juin 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi et Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală contre S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 306 à 308 – Régime particulier des agences de voyages – Champ d’application – Opérations effectuées par des agences de voyages consistant en la revente, à un prix comprenant une majoration, de billets d’avion achetés auprès de tiers assujettis – Absence de prestation This document does not exist in English.
februar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0763_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Case C-763/23.
april 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0768: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 11 avril 2025.#Commission européenne contre PB.#Pourvoi – Article 182 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Marchés publics de services – Irrégularités dans la procédure d’attribution de marchés – Décision de recouvrement de montants indûment versés – Administrateur de la société bénéficiaire – Possibilité de récupération auprès de l’administrateur de l’opérateur économique bénéficiaire de fonds de l’Union européenne – Mesure administrative.#Affaire C-768/23 P. This document does not exist in English.