september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0658: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 3 septembre 2024.#Investcapital Ltd contre TK.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence de la Cour ou ne laissant place à aucun doute raisonnable – Directive 2008/52/CE – Médiation en matière civile et commerciale – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une séance d’information obligatoire sur la médiation – Jurisprudence constitutionnelle invalidant cette réglementation – Compatibilité de cette jurisprudence avec la directive – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Possibilité pour le juge de réviser une clause abusive.#Affaire C-658/23. This document does not exist in English.
februar 04, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62023CO0658_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Investcapital Ltd v TK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 3 Bucureşti.#Case C-658/23.
junij 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0659: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2024.#LD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 42c – Placement on leave in the interests of the service – Withdrawal of rights and privileges – Article 90 of the Statute – Concept of ‘decision’ and ‘complaint’ – Period for lodging an appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case C-659/23 P.
januar 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0659_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2024.#LD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 42c – Placement on leave in the interests of the service – Withdrawal of rights and privileges – Article 90 of the Statute – Concept of ‘decision’ and ‘complaint’ – Period for lodging an appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case C-659/23 P.
april 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0670: Order of the Court of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.
december 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0670_INF: Order of the Court of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.
april 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0676: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 March 2024.#Sberbank of Russia PAO v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Intervention – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Decision not to adopt a resolution scheme – Parent company – Interest in the result of the case.#Case C-676/23 P(I).
december 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0676_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 March 2024.#Sberbank of Russia PAO v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Intervention – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Decision not to adopt a resolution scheme – Parent company – Interest in the result of the case.#Case C-676/23 P(I).
maj 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0688: Ordonnance de la Cour du 8 mai 2024.#Grzegorz Wyrębski contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-688/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
maj 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0689: Ordonnance de la Cour du 8 mai 2024.#Grzegorz Wyrębski contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-689/23 P. This document does not exist in English.