januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0764: Case T-764/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2023 — bet365 Group v EUIPO (bet365) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark bet365 — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0765: Case T-765/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Azalee Cosmetics v EUIPO — L’Oréal (UK) (LA CRÈME LIBRE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark LA CRÈME LIBRE — Earlier EU word mark LIBRE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
julij 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0766: Case T-766/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Canel Ferreiro v Council (Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
april 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0767: Case T-767/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Hoffmann v EUIPO — Moldex/Metric (Holex) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Holex — Earlier EU figurative mark MOLDEX — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
september 18, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0772: Case T-772/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO (BACK-2-NATURE) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark BACK-2-NATURE — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
december 11, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0773: Case T-773/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2023 — Contorno Textil v EUIPO — Harmont & Blaine (GILBERT TECKEL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark, representing a dachshund in profile, GILBERT TECKEL — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a dachshund in profile — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Legal certainty)
februar 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0776: Case T-776/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TP v Commission (Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion for a period of two years from procurement and grant award procedures funded by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF – Significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations in the implementation of a prior contract – Article 136(1)(e) of the Financial Regulation – No automatic link between a finding of a failure to comply with contractual obligations by the court having jurisdiction over the contract and the adoption of an exclusion measure by the authorising officer responsible – Obligation to conduct a specific and individual assessment of the conduct of the person concerned – Prior contract awarded to a grou
julij 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0777: Case T-777/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Penguin Random House v EUIPO – Ediciones Literarias Independientes (PLAN B) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark PLAN B – Earlier trade name Ediciones Plan B – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
marec 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0779: Case T-779/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Transport Werk v EUIPO — Haus & Grund Deutschland (Haus & Grund) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Haus & Grund — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptive character — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
avgust 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0781: Case T-781/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Madre Querida and Others v Commission (Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality)