oktober 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0761: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2023.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie e.V. v Roller GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which admits of no reasonable doubt – Energy – Framework for energy labelling – Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 – Article 6, first paragraph, point (a) – Obligation on suppliers and dealers of a product to make reference, in their visual advertisements, to the energy efficiency class of that product and the range of energy efficiency classes shown on the label for the product group concerned – Direct applicability of that obligation – Margin of discretion available to those suppliers and dealers to comply with th
maj 31, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0776: Order of the Court of 8 May 2023.#Studio Legale Ughi e Nunziante v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed in part.#Case C-776/22 P.
april 24, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0780: Order of the Court of 17 April 2023.#Zaun Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-780/22 P.
junij 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0780_INF: Order of the Court of 17 April 2023.#Zaun Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-780/22 P.
marec 24, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0781: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 March 2023.#LE v European Commission.#Interim measures – Articles 278, 279 and 299 TFEU – Appeal – Application for suspension of operation and for other interim measures – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of grants awarded by contract – Urgency – Pecuniary damage.#Case C-781/22 P-R.
avgust 28, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0781_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 March 2023.#LE v European Commission.#Interim measures – Articles 278, 279 and 299 TFEU – Appeal – Application for suspension of operation and for other interim measures – Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of grants awarded by contract – Urgency – Pecuniary damage.#Case C-781/22 P-R.
februar 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0783: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2023.#Trebor Robert Bilkiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Formal requirements for an appeal – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-783/22 P.
april 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0783_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2023.#Trebor Robert Bilkiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Formal requirements for an appeal – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-783/22 P.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0784: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 12 février 2025.#,,Solvay Sodi“ AD contre Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia „Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi“.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Nécessité d’une interprétation du droit de l’Union pour que la juridiction de renvoi puisse rendre son jugement – Absence – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-784/22. This document does not exist in English.
julij 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0784_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#,,Solvay Sodi“ AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia „Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Case C-784/22.