september 29, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0338: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 22 septembre 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-338/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
januar 16, 2023 0 88 CELEX:62022CO0338_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 September 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-338/22 P.
oktober 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0342: Order of the Court of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.
januar 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0342_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.
januar 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0357: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Refusal of access to personal data allegedly held by the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) following the refusal of access – Action directed against the implied rejection of the complaints – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
marec 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0357_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Refusal of access to personal data allegedly held by the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) following the refusal of access – Action directed against the implied rejection of the complaints – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfou
oktober 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0383: Order of the Court of 17 October 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-383/22 P.
januar 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0383_INF: Order of the Court of 17 October 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-383/22 P.
november 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0405: Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.
februar 06, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0405_INF: Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.