Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0229: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022.#NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Cancellation of a flight – Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing – Conditions – Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law – Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure.#Case C-229/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0229_SUM: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022.#NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Cancellation of a flight – Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing – Conditions – Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law – Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure.#Case C-229/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CO0230:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 septembre 2023.#Procédure pénale KN e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une interprétation de certaines dispositions du droit de l’Union par la Cour ainsi que du lien existant entre ces dispositions et la législation nationale applicable – Précisions insuffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-230/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CO0233:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 15 juillet 2022.#Meta Cluster GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-233/22 P.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First16421643164416451647164916501651Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top