april 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0175: Case T-175/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — RH v Commission (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance — Financial Regulation — Investigation by OLAF — Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures funded by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF — Entry on the database of the early detection and exclusion system — Grave professional misconduct — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
september 19, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0176: Case T-176/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — CCTY Bearing Company v EUIPO — CCVI International (CCTY) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark CCTY — Earlier EU figurative mark CCVI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Misuse of rights — Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001)
november 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0179: Case T-179/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — QN v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal report — 2019 appraisal procedure — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Liability)
junij 27, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0181: Case T-181/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Anferlux-Electrodomésticos (SmartThinQ) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SmartThinQ — Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings — Genuine use of the earlier mark)
februar 20, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0182: Case T-182/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PKK v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures imposed on the PKK with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Applicability to situations of armed conflict — Terrorist group — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Decision taken by a competent authority — Authority of a third State — Review — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection)
april 25, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0184: Case T-184/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяин) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяин — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 25, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0185: Case T-185/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяйка — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
marec 06, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0187: Case T-187/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — Firearms United Network and Others v Commission (REACH — Regulation (EU) 2021/57 — Updating of Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Restriction on lead — Use of lead shot for hunting in or around wetlands — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Presumption of innocence)
februar 21, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0188: Case T-188/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Lück v EUIPO — R. H. Investment (MALLE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MALLE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Ineffective nature of the single plea in law)
januar 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021TA0189: Case T-189/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aloe Vera of Europe v Commission (Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition of preparations from the leaf of Aloe species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – Third entry in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/468)