marec 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0758_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Measures implemented by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt Airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport – Decision declaring the aid measures to be incompatible in part with the internal market – Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union – Evidence submitted to the General Court after the written part of the procedure has been closed – Admissibility – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 17(1) and (2) – Powers of the European Commission to recover aid – Limitation period – Degree of precision with respect to actions that interrupt that period – Obligation to state re
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0759: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission.#Appeal – Authentication of a judgment by the General Court – Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Copy of the judgment to be served – Signature of the judges – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors – Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing – Concept of infringement ‘by object’ – European Commission’s burden of proof – Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Calculation of the basic amount – Sales to be taken into account – Mitigating circumstances – Unlimited jurisdic
december 01, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0759_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission.#Appeal – Authentication of a judgment by the General Court – Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Copy of the judgment to be served – Signature of the judges – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors – Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing – Concept of infringement ‘by object’ – European Commission’s burden of proof – Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Calculation of the basic amount – Sales to be taken into account – Mitigating circumstances – Unlimited juri
marec 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0760: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 2 mars 2023.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH contre Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité des aliments – Denrées alimentaires – Règlement (UE) no 609/2013 – Article 2, paragraphe 2, sous g) – Notion de “denrée alimentaire destinée à des fins médicales spéciales” – Autres exigences nutritionnelles particulières – Besoins nutritionnels – Modification du régime alimentaire – Nutriments – Utilisation sous contrôle médical – Ingrédients non absorbés ou métabolisés dans le canal alimentaire – Délimitation par rapport aux médicaments – Délimitation par rapport aux compléments alimentaires.#Affaire C-760/21. This document does not exist in English.
marec 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0760_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Food – Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 – Article 2(2)(g) – Concept of ‘food for special medical purposes’ – Other particular nutritional requirements – Nutritional requirements – Modification of the diet – Nutrients – Use under medical supervision – Ingredients not absorbed or metabolised in the alimentary canal – Distinction in relation to medicinal products – Distinction in relation to food supplements.#Case C-760/21.
junij 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0763: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 29. Juni 2023.#TUIfly GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Staatliche Beihilfen – Maßnahmen, die die Republik Österreich zugunsten des Flughafens Klagenfurt, von Ryanair und von anderen Fluggesellschaften, die diesen Flughafen nutzen, durchgeführt hat – Beschluss, mit dem die Beihilfemaßnahmen für teilweise mit dem Binnenmarkt unvereinbar erklärt werden – Art. 107 Abs. 1 AEUV – Marktwirtschaftlich handelnder privater Kapitalgeber – Ex‑ante‑Analyse der inkrementellen Rentabilität – Langfristige Rentabilität des Flughafens – Anwendbarkeit – Art. 107 Abs. 3 Buchst. c AEUV – Beihilfen zur Förderung der Entwicklung gewisser Wirtschaftszweige oder Wirtschaftsgebiete – Maßgebliches Kriterium für die Beurteilung This document does not exist in English.
december 01, 2023 0 44 CELEX:62021CJ0763_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Case C-763/21 P.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0765_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Padova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against COVID-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.#Case C-765/21.
januar 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0766: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal br