Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0558_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#Global Silicones Council and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – Annex XVII – Updating – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) – Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances – Very persistent and very bioaccumulative substances – Unacceptable risks.#Case C-558/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0559: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#Global Silicones Council and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Entry of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in that list – Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances (PBT) – Very persistent and very bioaccumulative substances (vPvB) – Bioaccumulation – Bioconcentration factor – Organo-metals.#Case C-559/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0559_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#Global Silicones Council and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Entry of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in that list – Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances – Very persistent and very bioaccumulative substances – Bioaccumulation – Bioconcentration factor – Organo-metals.#Case C-559/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0560:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 9. Februar 2023.#ZS gegen Zweckverband „Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen“ KISA, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten – Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 – Art. 38 Abs. 3 – Datenschutzbeauftragter – Verbot der Abberufung wegen der Erfüllung seiner Aufgaben – Erfordernis der funktionellen Unabhängigkeit – Nationale Regelung, nach der die Abberufung eines Datenschutzbeauftragten bei Fehlen eines wichtigen Grundes verboten ist.#Rechtssache C-560/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0561: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#GP and BG v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period for the action for restitution starts to run.#Case C-561/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0561_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#GP and BG v Banco Santander, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan contract – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Final judicial decision finding that term unfair and declaring it void – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Point from which the limitation period for the action for restitution starts to run.#Case C-561/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0562: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#X and Y v Openbaar Ministerie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believin

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0562_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#X and Y v Openbaar Ministerie.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifical

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0564: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 December 2022.#BU v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Fundamental rights – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 11(1), Article 23(1) and Article 46(1) and (3) – Access to information in the applicant’s file – Completeness of the file – Metadata – Communication of that file in the form of individual unstructured electronic files – Information in writing – Digitised copy of the decision with a handwritten signature – Keeping of the electronic file without archiving a paper file.#Case C-564/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0565:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 16. März 2023.#Caixabank SA gegen X.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Verbraucherschutz – Richtlinie 93/13/EWG – Art. 3, 4 und 5 – Verbraucherverträge – Hypothekendarlehen – Missbräuchliche Klauseln – Klausel über die Provision für die Bereitstellung des Darlehens – Klage auf Nichtigerklärung dieser Klausel und Rückzahlung des insoweit gezahlten Betrags – Klarheit und Verständlichkeit der Klauseln – Vorliegen spezifischer nationaler Rechtsvorschriften.#Rechtssache C-565/21.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First11521153115411551157115911601161Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top