januar 17, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0621: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 January 2024.#WS v Intervyuirasht organ na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite pri Ministerskia savet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 10(1)(d) – Acts of persecution – Article 9(1) and (2) – Link between the reasons for and acts of persecution or between the reasons for persecution and the absence of protection against such acts – Article 9(3) – Non-State actors – Article 6(c) – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – ‘Serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Assessment of applications for internati
junij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0621_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 January 2024.#WS v Intervyuirasht organ na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite pri Ministerskia savet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Qualification for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – ‘Membership of a particular social group’ – Article 10(1)(d) – Acts of persecution – Article 9(1) and (2) – Link between the reasons for and acts of persecution or between the reasons for persecution and the absence of protection against such acts – Article 9(3) – Non-State actors – Article 6(c) – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – ‘Se
december 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0625: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 8 décembre 2022.#VB contre GUPFINGER Einrichtungsstudio GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Dénonciation illégitime d’un contrat par le consommateur – Clause déclarée abusive déterminant le droit du professionnel à la réparation du préjudice – Application du droit interne à caractère supplétif.#Affaire C-625/21. This document does not exist in English.
maj 03, 2023 0 88 CELEX:62021CJ0625_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#VB v GUPFINGER Einrichtungsstudio GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Case C-625/21.
maj 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0626: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 17. Mai 2023.#Funke Sp. z o.o. gegen Landespolizeidirektion Wien.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Angleichung der Rechtsvorschriften – Richtlinie 2001/95/EG – Art. 12 und Anhang II – Normen und technische Vorschriften – System der Europäischen Union zum raschen Informationsaustausch (RAPEX) – Leitlinien – Gefährliche Non-Food-Produkte – Durchführungsbeschluss (EU) 2019/417 – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 765/2008 – Art. 20 und 22 – Meldungen an die Europäische Kommission – Verwaltungsentscheidung – Verbot des Verkaufs bestimmter pyrotechnischer Gegenstände und Verpflichtung zur Rücknahme – Antrag eines Händlers für die betreffenden Produkte auf Vervollständigung der Meldungen – Für die Entscheidung über den Antrag zuständige B This document does not exist in English.
september 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0626_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Funke Sp. z o.o. v Landespolizeidirektion Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/95/EC – Article 12 and Annex II – Technical standards and regulations – European Union Rapid Information System (RAPEX) – Guidelines – Dangerous non-food products – Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/417 – Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 – Articles 20 and 22 – Notifications to the European Commission – Administrative decision – Prohibition on the sale of certain pyrotechnic articles and obligation to withdraw – Request from a distributor of the products concerned that the notification be supplemented – Authority competent to give a de
april 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0628: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#TB v Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and „Knor“ Sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Right of information – Locus standi – Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance.#Case C-628/21.
november 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0631: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Taxi Horn Tours BV v gemeente Weert and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Award of contracts – Article 2(1)(10) – Concept of an ‘economic operator’ – Inclusion of a general partnership without legal personality – Article 19(2) and Article 63 – Joint undertaking or reliance on the capacities of other entities of persons linked with that undertaking – Article 59(1) – Obligation to submit one or several European Single Procurement Documents (ESPD) – Purpose of the ESPD.#Case C-631/21.
september 14, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0632: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#JF and NS v Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Scope – Timeshare contracts – Legal proceedings seeking a declaration that those contracts are void – United Kingdom nationals – Choice of applicable law – Article 3 – Freedom of choice – Article 4(1)(b) and (c) – Applicable law in the absence of a choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Consumer contracts – Limits.#Case C-632/21.
februar 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0633: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 16 février 2023.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air ambiant – Article 13, paragraphe 1, et annexe XI – Dépassement systématique et persistant de la valeur limite annuelle fixée pour le dioxyde d’azote (ΝΟ2) dans l’agglomération d’Athènes (Grèce) – Article 23, paragraphe 1 – Annexe XV – Période de dépassement “la plus courte possible” – Mesures appropriées.#Affaire C-633/21. This document does not exist in English.