september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0794: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-794/21 P and C-800/21 P.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0795: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#WEPA Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-795/21 P and C-796/21 P.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0801: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered United Kingdom word mark BASMATI – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72 – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Articles 126 and 127 – Transition period – Effects of the end of the transition period on the protection of the
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0801_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered United Kingdom word mark BASMATI – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72 – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Articles 126 and 127 – Transition period – Effects of the end of the transition period on the protection of
avgust 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0801_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered United Kingdom word mark BASMATI – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72 – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Articles 126 and 127 – Transition period – Effects of the end of the transition period on the protection of
september 07, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0803: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Versobank AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution Versobank AS – Division of powers between the ECB and the national competent authorities – Procedural rights – Procedural defects.#Case C-803/21 P.
april 28, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0804: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 28. April 2022.#C und CD gegen Syyttäjä.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen – Europäischer Haftbefehl – Rahmenbeschluss 2002/584/JI – Art. 23 Abs. 3 – Erfordernis eines Tätigwerdens der vollstreckenden Justizbehörde – Art. 6 Abs. 2 – Polizeibehörden – Ausschluss – Höhere Gewalt – Begriff – Rechtliche Hindernisse für die Übergabe – Von der gesuchten Person erhobene gesetzliche Klagen – Antrag auf internationalen Schutz – Ausschluss – Art. 23 Abs. 5 – Ablauf der Fristen für die Übergabe – Folgen – Freilassung – Verpflichtung zum Erlass jeglicher anderen Maßnahme zur Verhinderung der Flucht.#Rechtssache C-804/21 PPU. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0804_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#C and CD v Syyttäjä.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 23(3) – Requirement of intervention on the part of the executing judicial authority – Article 6(2) – Police services – Not included – Force majeure – Concept – Legal obstacles to surrender – Legal actions brought by the requested person – Application for international protection – Not included – Article 23(5) – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Release – Obligation to adopt any other measures necessary to prevent abscon
februar 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0806: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Openbaar Ministerie v TF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Drug precursors – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Article 2(1)(d) – Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs – Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 – Scheduled substances – Article 2 – Concept of ‘operator’ – Article 8(1) – Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances – Obligation to notify those circumstances – Concept of ‘circumstance’ – Scope.#Case C-806/21.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0806_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Criminal proceedings against TF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Drug precursors – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Article 2(1)(d) – Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs – Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 – Scheduled substances – Article 2 – Concept of ‘operator’ – Article 8(1) – Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances – Obligation to notify those circumstances – Concept of ‘circumstance’ – Scope.#Case C-806/21.