maj 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0262_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 August 2021.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Scope – Article 2(11) – Definition of ‘wrongful removal or retention of a child’ – Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 – Application for return of a child of a young age whose parents have joint custody – Third-country nationals – Transfer of the child and his mother to the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III).#Case C-262/21 PPU.
september 08, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CJ0263: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC) v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 5(2)(b) – Exclusive reproduction right – Exception – Copies for private use – Levy – Ex ante exemption – Exemption certificate issued by a private law entity controlled solely by copyright management societies – Powers of review of that entity.#Case C-263/21.
julij 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0264: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia v Koninklijke Philips N.V.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 85/374/EEC – Liability for defective products – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘producer’ – Any person who, by putting his name, trade mark or other distinguishing feature on the product, or having authorised those particulars to be put on the product, presents himself as its producer.#Case C-264/21.
maj 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0264_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia v Koninklijke Philips NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 85/374/EEC – Liability for defective products – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘producer’ – Any person who, by putting his name, trade mark or other distinguishing feature on the product, or having authorised those particulars to be put on the product, presents himself as its producer.#Case C-264/21.
oktober 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0266: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v HV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common transport policy – Directive 2006/126/EC – Article 11(2) and (4) – Suspension of the right to drive a motor vehicle – Driving licence issued by the Member State of normal residence in exchange for a driving licence issued by another Member State – Refusal by the first Member State to enforce a decision suspending the right to drive adopted by the second Member State – Obligation for the second Member State not to recognise, in its territory, the validity of the driving licence that has been suspended.#Case C-266/21.
avgust 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0267: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Uniqa Asigurări SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 56 – Supply of insurance services – Point of reference for tax purposes – Claims settlement services provided by third-party companies in the name and on behalf of an insurer.#Case C-267/21.
marec 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0268: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 2 mars 2023.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB contre Per Nycander AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 6, paragraphes 3 et 4 – Licéité du traitement – Production d’un document contenant des données à caractère personnel dans le cadre d’une procédure juridictionnelle civile – Article 23, paragraphe 1, sous f) et j) – Protection de l’indépendance de la justice et des procédures judiciaires – Exécution des demandes de droit civil – Exigences à respecter – Prise en compte de l’intérêt des personnes concernées – Pondération des intérêts opposés en présence – Article 5 – Minimisation des données à caractère personnel – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union europée This document does not exist in English.
marec 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0268_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(3) and (4) – Lawfulness of processing – Production of a document containing personal data in civil court proceedings – Article 23(1)(f) and (j) – Protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings – Enforcement of civil law claims – Requirements to be complied with – Having regard to the interests of the data subjects – Balancing of the opposing interests involved – Article 5 – Minimisation of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for private life – Article 8 – Right to protection of personal data –
marec 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0270: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 mars 2023.##Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Reconnaissance dans un État membre des qualifications professionnelles – Directive 2005/36/CE – Droit d’exercer la profession d’enseignant d’école maternelle – Profession réglementée – Droit d’accès à la profession sur la base d’un diplôme émis dans l’État membre d’origine – Qualification professionnelle obtenue dans un pays tiers.#Affaire C-270/21. This document does not exist in English.
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0274: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Not applicable to procedures for granting an interlocutory injunction and review procedures as referred to in Article 2 of Directive 89/665/EEC in the absence of an international element – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 33 – Treatment of a framework agreement as a contract, for the purposes of Article 2a(2) of Directive 89/665 – Not possible to award a new public contract where the quantity and/or maximum value of the works, supplies or services concerned laid down by the framework agreement has or have already been reached – National legislat