Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0431: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#X GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Corporation tax – Determination of the taxable income of companies – Transactions featuring foreign elements – Obligation to provide fiscal documentation of business relations between parties with a relationship of interdependence – Estimate of the taxable income and surcharge by way of a penalty.#Case C-431/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0432:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 2 mars 2023.#Commission européenne contre République de Pologne.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 6, paragraphes 1 à 3, article 12, paragraphe 1, sous a) à d), article 13, paragraphe 1, sous a), et article 16, paragraphe 1 – Directive 2009/147/CE – Conservation des oiseaux sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 1, article 5, sous a), b) et d), et article 9, paragraphe 1 – Gestion forestière fondée sur la bonne pratique – Plans de gestion forestière – Convention d’Aarhus – Accès à la justice – Article 6, paragraphe 1, sous b), et article 9, paragraphe 2 – Examen de la légalité, quant au fond et à la procédure, des

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0433: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#Agenzia delle Entrate v Contship Italia SpA.#References for a preliminary ruling – Direct taxation – Freedom of establishment – Corporate income tax – Measures to prevent tax avoidance by shell companies – Determination of taxable income on the basis of presumed minimum income – Exclusion from the scope of those measures of companies and entities listed on national regulated markets.#Joined Cases C-433/21 and C-434/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0436: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#flightright GmbH v American Airlines, Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(1)(a) – Scope – Article 2(f) to (h) – Concept of ‘ticket’ – Concept of ‘reservation’ – Concept of ‘connecting flight’ – Reservation through a travel agency – Article 7 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Transport operation consisting of a number of flights operated by separate operating air carriers – Connecting flight departing from an airport located in a Member State with a stop in Switzerland and final destination in a third country.#Case C-436/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0437: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#Liberty Lines SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 – Articles 1 and 4 – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 1 – Direct award of public service contracts – Public services for high-speed maritime passenger transport – Treatment like railway transport services provided by sea.#Case C-437/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0438: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission and Biogen Netherlands BV v European Medicines Agency.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera – Decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) not to validate the application for marketing authorisation – Earlier European Commission decision taking the view that Tecfidera was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm – Previously authorised combination medicinal product – Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product – Assessment of the existence of a global ma

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0438_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma S.A.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera – Decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) not to validate the application for marketing authorisation – Earlier European Commission decision taking the view that Tecfidera was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm – Previously authorised combination medicinal product – Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product – Assessment of the existence of a global mark

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0441: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain – Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services.#Case C-441/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0441_INF: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain – Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services.#Case C-441/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0442: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport A/S and Danske Fragtmænd A/S v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for the discharge of a universal service obligation – Calculation – Net avoided cost methodology – Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service – Use of funds granted as compensation – Guarantee covering the redundancy costs of a certain category of employee in the event of insolvency of the universal service provider – Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market.#Case C-442/21 P.

RSS
First11251126112711281130113211331134Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top