Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0284_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023.#European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Restructuring aid – Banking sector – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Restructuring plan – Commitments given by the Member State concerned – Burden-sharing measures – Conversion of subordinated debts into equity – Bondholders – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Natural or legal person directly and individually concerned – Breach of the procedural rights of interested parties – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 108(2) TFEU – Concept of ‘parties concerned’ – Regul

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0286:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 28 avril 2022.#Commission européenne contre République française.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air ambiant – Article 13, paragraphe 1, et annexe XI – Dépassement systématique et persistant des valeurs limites fixées pour les microparticules (PM10) dans certaines zones de France – Article 23, paragraphe 1 – Annexe XV – Période de dépassement “la plus courte possible” – Mesures appropriées.#Affaire C-286/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0288:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2022.#Universität Koblenz-Landau gegen Europäische Exekutivagentur für Bildung und Kultur.#Rechtsmittel – Schiedsklausel – Tempus‑IV-Programme – Finanzhilfevereinbarungen Ecesis, Diusas und Deque – Systembedingte und immer wiederkehrende Unregelmäßigkeiten – Vollständige Rückforderung der ausgezahlten Beträge – Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör – Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit – Grundsatz des Vertrauensschutzes – Antrag auf Wiedereröffnung des mündlichen Verfahrens im ersten Rechtszug – Art. 113 Abs. 2 Buchst. c der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichts.#Rechtssache C-288/21 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0290: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 May 2023.#Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM) v Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(2) – Communication to the public by satellite – Concept – Satellite package provider – Broadcasting of programmes in another Member State – Place of the act of exploitation by which that provider participates in such communication.#Case C-290/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0290_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 May 2023.#Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM) v Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(2) – Communication to the public by satellite – Concept – Satellite package provider – Broadcasting of programmes in another Member State – Place of the act of exploitation by which that provider participates in such communication.#Case C-290/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0291: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Proceedings brought by Starkinvest SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure – Conditions for issuing a preservation order – Article 4 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Article 7 – Concept of ‘judgment requiring the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim’ – Judgment ordering a party to make a penalty payment for breach of a prohibitory order – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 55 – Scope.#Case C-291/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0292: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 2(2)(d) – Substantive scope – Service in the field of transport – Provision of road safety awareness and re-education courses for the recovery of driving licence points – Concession to operate a public service – Article 15 – Requirements – Division of the relevant territory into five lots – Quantitative and territorial limit on access to the activity concerned – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Justification – Road safety – Proportionality – Service of g

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0292_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 2(2)(d) – Substantive scope – Service in the field of transport – Provision of road safety awareness and re-education courses for the recovery of driving licence points – Concession to operate a public service – Article 15 – Requirements – Division of the relevant territory into five lots – Quantitative and territorial limit on access to the activity concerned – Overriding reasons in the public interes

RSS
First11271128112911301132113411351136Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top