marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0391_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Enrico Falqui v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the pension of a former Member of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Withdrawal and replacement of the decisions of the Parliament – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings for annulment of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-391/21 P.
december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0392: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#TJ v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 90/270/EEC – Article 9(3) – Work with display screen equipment – Protection of workers’ eyes and eyesight – Special corrective appliances – Spectacles – Acquisition by the employee – Arrangements for the employer to meet the costs.#Case C-392/21.
februar 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0393: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 23(c) – Stay of enforcement of a judgment certified as a European Enforcement Order – Exceptional circumstances – Concept.#Case C-393/21.
september 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0393_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 23(c) – Stay of enforcement of a judgment certified as a European Enforcement Order – Exceptional circumstances – Concept.#Case C-393/21.
marec 02, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0394: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 2 mars 2023.#Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA contre Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei i (ANRE).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Règlement (UE) 2019/943 – Article 1er, sous b) et c), ainsi que article 3 – Principes relatifs au fonctionnement des marchés de l’électricité – Règlement (UE) 2015/1222 – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Opérateur désigné du marché de l’électricité – Monopole national légal pour les services d’échange journaliers et infrajournaliers – Réglementation nationale prévoyant un monopole de la négociation en gros de l’électricité à court, à moyen et à long terme.#Affaire C-394/21. This document does not exist in English.
januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0395: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#D.V. v M.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Contract for the provision of legal services concluded between a lawyer and a consumer – Article 4(2) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Term providing for the payment of lawyers’ fees on the basis of an hourly rate – Article 6(1) – Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be ‘unfair’.#Case C-395/21.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0395_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#D.V. v M.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Contract for the provision of legal services concluded between a lawyer and a consumer – Article 4(2) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Term providing for the payment of lawyers’ fees on the basis of an hourly rate – Article 6(1) – Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be ‘unfair’.#Case C-395/21.
januar 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0396: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 12 janvier 2023.#KT et NS contre FTI Touristik GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive (UE) 2015/2302 – Article 14, paragraphe 1 – Voyages à forfait et prestations de voyage liées – Exécution d’un contrat de voyage à forfait – Responsabilité de l’organisateur concerné – Mesures de lutte contre la propagation mondiale d’une maladie infectieuse – Pandémie de COVID-19 – Restrictions prises sur le lieu de destination et sur le lieu de résidence du voyageur concerné ainsi que dans d’autres pays – Non-conformité des services fournis dans le cadre du forfait concerné – Réduction de prix appropriée de ce forfait.#Affaire C-396/21. This document does not exist in English.
februar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0396_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#KT and NS v FTI Touristik GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 14(1) – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Performance of a package travel contract – Liability of the organiser concerned – Measures to fight the worldwide spread of an infectious disease – COVID‑19 pandemic – Restrictions imposed at the travel destination and in the place of residence of the traveller concerned and in other countries – Lack of conformity of the services provided as part of the package concerned – Appropriate reduction in the price of that package.#Case C-396/21.
oktober 13, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0397: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#HUMDA Magyar Autó-Motorsport Fejlesztési Ügynökség Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Sales which are not subject to VAT – VAT unduly invoiced and paid – Liquidation of the provider – Refusal by the tax authority to refund to the customer VAT improperly paid – Principles of effectiveness, tax neutrality and non-discrimination.#Case C-397/21.