Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0338_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v S.S. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 27 – Appeal against a transfer decision taken in respect of an asylum seeker – Article 29 – Suspension of implementation of the transfer decision – Transfer time limit – Interruption of the transfer time limit – Directive 2004/81/EC – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Article 6 – Reflecti

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0339: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – Article 13 – Conditions attached to the general authorisation – Annex I, Part A, point 4 – Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities – Article 3 – General objectives – National legislation on the reimbursement of costs associated with interception activities that telecommunications operators are ordered by the judicial authorities to carry out – Absence of full reimbursement mechanism – Principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and transparency.#Case C-339/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0340: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2023.#VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to that processing – Article 24 – Accountability of the controller – Article 32 – Measures implemented to ensure security of processing – Assessment of the appropriateness of such measures – Scope of judicial review – Taking of evidence – Article 82 – Right to compensation and liability – Possible exemption from liability of the controller in the event of infringement by third parties – Claim for compensation for non-material damage based on fear of potential misuse of personal data.#Case C-340/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0342:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 9 février 2023.#Commission européenne contre République slovaque.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air ambiant – Article 13, paragraphe 1, et annexe XI – Dépassement systématique et persistant des valeurs limites applicables aux microparticules (PM10) dans certaines zones de la Slovaquie – Article 23, paragraphe 1 – Annexe XV – Période de dépassement de ces valeurs limites “la plus courte possible” – Mesures appropriées.#Affaire C-342/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0343: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#PV v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support measures for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development – Agri-environmental payments – Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 – Inability of the beneficiaries to continue to comply with the commitments given – Concepts of ‘reparcelling’ and ‘land-consolidation measures’ – Absence of measures necessary to adapt the obligations of the beneficiary to the new situation of the holding – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Concept of ‘force majeure and exceptional circumstances’.#Case C-343/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0343_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#PV v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support measures for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development – Agri-environmental payments – Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 – Inability of the beneficiaries to continue to comply with the commitments given – Concepts of ‘reparcelling’ and ‘land-consolidation measures’ – Absence of measures necessary to adapt the obligations of the beneficiary to the new situation of the holding – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Concept of ‘force majeure and exceptional circumstances’.#Case C-

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0347: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#DD v Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8(1) – Right of an accused person to be present at the trial – Examination of an incriminating witness in the absence of the accused person – Possibility of remedying the infringement of a right at a later stage in the proceedings – Additional examination of the same witness – Directive 2013/48/EU – Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1) – Examination of an incriminating witness in the absence of the lawye

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0348:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 8 décembre 2022.#HYA e.a. contre Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Renforcement de certains aspects de la présomption d’innocence et du droit d’assister à son procès dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Droit d’une personne poursuivie d’assister à son procès – Article 47, deuxième alinéa, et article 48, paragraphe 2, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit à un procès équitable et droits de la défense – Interrogatoire de témoins à charge en l’absence de la personne poursuivie et de son avocat lors de la phase préliminaire de la procédure pénale – Impossibilité d’interroger les témoin

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0349: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#HYA and Others v Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Limitation of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-349/21.

RSS
First11161117111811191121112311241125Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top