Search
× Search

CELEX:62024CJ0588_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of u

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0615_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Ambito territoriale di caccia Ancona 2 v Azienda Agricola Camarzano di RK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agricultural sector – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – De minimis aid – Monitoring – Member State providing for the grant and the payment of de minimis aid without requiring a specific declaration from the applicant undertaking as to the amount and nature of any other State aid received during a period of three fiscal years – Production of self-certification relating to such aid.#Case C-615/24.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0540_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#European Commission v Covington & Burling and Bart Van Vooren.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3), second subparagraph – Protection of the decision-making process – Refusal to disclose documents relating to the votes of the Member States concerning the amendment of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 – Comitology – Decision 1999/468/EC – Regulatory procedure with scrutiny – Cross-appeal.#Case C-540/23 P.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0247: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2026.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Request to initiate an investigation – Refusal by EIOPA – Decision of the Board of Appeal to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-247/24.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0542_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#FW and Others v European External Action Service.#Case T-542/24.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0171_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Joined Cases C-171/24 P to C-177/24 P.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0384_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#OQ v European Commission.#Case T-384/23.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0169_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Cosmetics Europe - The Personal Care Association v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 9 and 10 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-169/25.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0266_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#HTG GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-266/25.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0298_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#PFP Monaco v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BRAMANI – Earlier EU word mark BRAHMA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-298/25.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0437_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Empreinte v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-437/25.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0374_RES: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#EO v European Parliament.#Civil Service – Members of the temporary staff – Publication of a press release by a political group of the Parliament – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Liability – Material and non-material harm – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-374/25.

maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0317:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 20 mai 2026.#JG contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs.#* Langue de procédure : le grec. Fonction publique – Agents contractuels – Licenciement à la fin du stage – Harcèlement moral – Demande d’injonction – Incompétence manifeste partielle – Responsabilité – Préjudices matériel et moral – Règle de concordance – Irrecevabilité manifeste partielle».#Affaire T-317/25.

This document does not exist in English.
maj 23, 2026 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba II U 105/2024-11

Izkaz višine stroškov ne predstavlja nemogoče zahteve, saj bi tožnik, ki očitno meni, da blagajniški prejemki obstajajo, le-te lahko pridobil na isti način kot organ in s tem izkazal višino stroškov in investicij, ki naj bi jih plačal sam. Tožnik tega ni storil, prav tako pa ni pojasnil zakaj tega ne more storiti (denimo, da je poskušal pridobiti izpiske, pa mu jih družba ni posredovala ipd.). Ob tem pa niti ZDavP-2 niti ZUS-1 ne vsebujeta dokaznega pravila (in dubio), ki bi v primeru nejasnosti omogočal izid ugotovitve dejstev v korist ene od strank.
maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

Finančna uprava prejela nagrado Prizma za odličnost v komuniciranju

maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0198_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#TQ v Mr Green Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal a

maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0447_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v SO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal

maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0684_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 21 mai 2026.#Across Fiduciaria SpA e.a. contre Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Prévention de l’utilisation du système financier aux fins du blanchiment de capitaux ou du financement du terrorisme – Directive (UE) 2015/849 – Article 31 – Notion de constructions juridiques présentant “une structure ou des fonctions similaires à celles des fiducies/trusts” – Mandats fiduciaires conclus par des sociétés fiduciaires de droit italien (mandato fiduciario) – Accès de personnes ayant un intérêt légitime aux informations sur les bénéficiaires effectifs – Validité – Articles 7 et 8 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Respect de la vie privée et familiale – Protection des d

This document does not exist in English.
maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0557:           Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 21 mai 2026.#Malacalza Investimenti Srl et Vittorio Malacalza contre Banque centrale européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Politique économique et monétaire – Surveillance prudentielle des établissements de crédit – Décisions prises par la Banque centrale européenne (BCE) concernant Banca Carige SpA – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers – Principe de protection de la confiance légitime – Conflit d’intérêts – Proportionnalité – Égalité de traitement – Droit de propriété – Motivation de l’arrêt du Tribunal.#Affaire C-557/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
maj 22, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0545: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Utiledulci – Comércio Internacional e Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. – Zona Franca da Madeira v Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Aid scheme that is incompatible with the internal market – Detailed rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery of aid – Recovery obligation – Article 16(3) – Immediate and effective execution – Procedural autonomy afforded to Member States – Suspension of the national tax enforcement procedure – Condition relating to the provision of an appropriate guarantee – Compatibility.#Case C-545/24.

maj 22, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
First7374757678808182Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top