﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS Genrated: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 04:06:04 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"><channel><title>Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanje</title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online:443/Sporočila/rss/522</link><atom:link href="https://modro.infomedia.online:443/Sporočila/rss/522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><description>RSS document</description><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0134_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 January 2026.#D S.A. v P S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance.#Case T-134/25.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025tj0134-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-extended-composition-of-21-january-2026d-sa-v-p-sarequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sąd-rejonowy-dla-mst-warszawy-w-warszawiereference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-air-transport-compensation-to-passengers-in-the-event-of-a-long-delay-or-cancellation-of-a-flight-exemption-extraordinary-circumstances-article-53-of-regulation-ec-no-2612004-air-traffic-management-decision-allocation-of-delayed-departure-slots-due-to-adverse-weather-conditions-possibility-of-relying-on-a-flight-subsequent-to-that-affected-by-the-occurrence-of-an-extraordinary-circumstancecase-t-13425</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025tj0134-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-extended-composition-of-21-january-2026d-sa-v-p-sarequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sąd-rejonowy-dla-mst-warszawy-w-warszawiereference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-air-transport-compensation-to-passengers-in-the-event-of-a-long-delay-or-cancellation-of-a-flight-exemption-extraordinary-circumstances-article-53-of-regulation-ec-no-2612004-air-traffic-management-decision-allocation-of-delayed-departure-slots-due-to-adverse-weather-conditions-possibility-of-relying-on-a-flight-subsequent-to-that-affected-by-the-occurrence-of-an-extraordinary-circumstancecase-t-13425</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349733]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025CO0358:            Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#M.O.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2017/1132 – Publicité et actualisation des indications concernant les sociétés – Cessation des fonctions par des membres du conseil d’administration – Fondation – Inapplicabilité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-358/25.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025co0358-ordonnance-de-la-cour-huitième-chambre-du-16-juillet-2026morenvoi-préjudiciel-article-53-paragraphe-2-du-règlement-de-procédure-de-la-cour-directive-ue-20171132-publicité-et-actualisation-des-indications-concernant-les-sociétés-cessation-des-fonctions-par-des-membres-du-conseil-dadministration-fondation-inapplicabilité-article-47-de-la-charte-des-droits-fondamentaux-de-lunion-européenne-absence-de-mise-en-œuvre-du-droit-de-lunion-irrecevabilité-manifesteaffaire-c-35825</link><description><![CDATA[This document does not exist in English.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025co0358-ordonnance-de-la-cour-huitième-chambre-du-16-juillet-2026morenvoi-préjudiciel-article-53-paragraphe-2-du-règlement-de-procédure-de-la-cour-directive-ue-20171132-publicité-et-actualisation-des-indications-concernant-les-sociétés-cessation-des-fonctions-par-des-membres-du-conseil-dadministration-fondation-inapplicabilité-article-47-de-la-charte-des-droits-fondamentaux-de-lunion-européenne-absence-de-mise-en-œuvre-du-droit-de-lunion-irrecevabilité-manifesteaffaire-c-35825</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349732]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0069_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 February 2026.#A GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Interpretation – Concept of ‘goods put up in sets’ consisting of two or more separate constituents – Note 3 to Section VI of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.#Case T-69/25.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025tj0069-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-extended-composition-of-25-february-2026a-gmbh-v-hauptzollamt-crequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-bundesfinanzhofreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-common-customs-tariff-tariff-classification-combined-nomenclature-interpretation-concept-of-goods-put-up-in-sets-consisting-of-two-or-more-separate-constituents-note-3-to-section-vi-of-annex-i-to-regulation-eec-no-265887case-t-6925</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025tj0069-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-extended-composition-of-25-february-2026a-gmbh-v-hauptzollamt-crequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-bundesfinanzhofreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-common-customs-tariff-tariff-classification-combined-nomenclature-interpretation-concept-of-goods-put-up-in-sets-consisting-of-two-or-more-separate-constituents-note-3-to-section-vi-of-annex-i-to-regulation-eec-no-265887case-t-6925</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349731]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of ]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025co0255-sum-order-of-the-court-seventh-chamber-of-29-june-2026technikes-anaktisis-kai-diachorismou-ae-ecoreset-ae-v-perifereia-attikisreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-reply-which-may-be-clearly-deduced-from-existing-case-law-private-investment-aid-scheme-aid-scheme-compatible-with-the-internal-market-refusal-by-the-competent-authority-to-grant-aid-under-that-scheme-legal-action-seeking-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-retroactive-effect-of-a-possible-judicial-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-expiry-during-the-legal-proceedings-of-the-period-laid-down-for-granting-the-aid-under-that-aid-scheme-date-on-which-the-aid-concerned-is-deemed-to-have-been-granted-article-47-of-the-charter-of-fundamental</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62025co0255-sum-order-of-the-court-seventh-chamber-of-29-june-2026technikes-anaktisis-kai-diachorismou-ae-ecoreset-ae-v-perifereia-attikisreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-reply-which-may-be-clearly-deduced-from-existing-case-law-private-investment-aid-scheme-aid-scheme-compatible-with-the-internal-market-refusal-by-the-competent-authority-to-grant-aid-under-that-scheme-legal-action-seeking-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-retroactive-effect-of-a-possible-judicial-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-expiry-during-the-legal-proceedings-of-the-period-laid-down-for-granting-the-aid-under-that-aid-scheme-date-on-which-the-aid-concerned-is-deemed-to-have-been-granted-article-47-of-the-charter-of-fundamental</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349730]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0689_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Right to deduct input VAT – Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised – Fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case T-689/24.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62024tj0689-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-chamber-giving-preliminary-rulings-of-11-february-2026i-sa-v-dyrektor-krajowej-informacji-skarbowejreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-taxation-common-system-of-vat-right-to-deduct-input-vat-article-167-article-168a-and-article-178a-of-directive-2006112ec-issuing-of-the-invoice-showing-the-vat-during-the-tax-period-following-that-in-respect-of-which-the-right-of-deduction-is-exercised-fiscal-neutrality-and-proportionalitycase-t-68924</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62024tj0689-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-chamber-giving-preliminary-rulings-of-11-february-2026i-sa-v-dyrektor-krajowej-informacji-skarbowejreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-taxation-common-system-of-vat-right-to-deduct-input-vat-article-167-article-168a-and-article-178a-of-directive-2006112ec-issuing-of-the-invoice-showing-the-vat-during-the-tax-period-following-that-in-respect-of-which-the-right-of-deduction-is-exercised-fiscal-neutrality-and-proportionalitycase-t-68924</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349729]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0691_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 March 2026.#Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili v Heineken România S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff classification – Heading 2206 – Subheadings 2206 00 31, 2206 00 51, 2206 00 81 and 2206 00 39, 2206 00 59 – Beverages composed of fermented apple juice, in which the proportion of alcohol derived from plants other than apples is, depending on the type of beverage, equal at least to 48%, 50%, 51%, 52% or 53% in comparison with the alcohol obtained from the fermentation of apples and which have the organoleptic characteristics of cider.#Case T-69]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62024tj0691-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-extended-composition-of-4-march-2026agenţia-naţională-de-administrare-fiscală-anaf-and-direcţia-generală-de-administrare-a-marilor-contribuabili-v-heineken-românia-sareference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-common-customs-tariff-combined-nomenclature-tariff-classification-heading-2206-subheadings-2206-00-31-2206-00-51-2206-00-81-and-2206-00-39-2206-00-59-beverages-composed-of-fermented-apple-juice-in-which-the-proportion-of-alcohol-derived-from-plants-other-than-apples-is-depending-on-the-type-of-beverage-equal-at-least-to-48-50-51-52-or-53-in-comparison-with-the-alcohol-obtained-from-the-fermentation-of-apples-and-which-have-the-organoleptic-characteristics-of-cidercase-t-69124</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62024tj0691-sum-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-extended-composition-of-4-march-2026agenţia-naţională-de-administrare-fiscală-anaf-and-direcţia-generală-de-administrare-a-marilor-contribuabili-v-heineken-românia-sareference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-common-customs-tariff-combined-nomenclature-tariff-classification-heading-2206-subheadings-2206-00-31-2206-00-51-2206-00-81-and-2206-00-39-2206-00-59-beverages-composed-of-fermented-apple-juice-in-which-the-proportion-of-alcohol-derived-from-plants-other-than-apples-is-depending-on-the-type-of-beverage-equal-at-least-to-48-50-51-52-or-53-in-comparison-with-the-alcohol-obtained-from-the-fermentation-of-apples-and-which-have-the-organoleptic-characteristics-of-cidercase-t-69124</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349728]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62023CJ0728_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union and Représentant spécial de l’Union européenne en Bosnie-Herzégovine.#Appeal – Staff coming under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – International contract staff member hired by the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Successive fixed-term employment contracts – Termination of the employment contract following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – Appeal brought by a Member State which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court – Third paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62023cj0728-sum-judgment-of-the-court-first-chamber-of-12-march-2026kingdom-of-spain-v-council-of-the-european-union-and-représentant-spécial-de-lunion-européenne-en-bosnie-herzégovineappeal-staff-coming-under-the-common-foreign-and-security-policy-cfsp-international-contract-staff-member-hired-by-the-european-union-special-representative-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-termination-of-the-employment-contract-following-the-withdrawal-of-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-from-the-european-union-appeal-brought-by-a-member-state-which-did-not-intervene-in-the-proceedings-before-the-general-court-third-paragraph-of-article-56-of-the-statute-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-admissibility-of-the-appeal-</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62023cj0728-sum-judgment-of-the-court-first-chamber-of-12-march-2026kingdom-of-spain-v-council-of-the-european-union-and-représentant-spécial-de-lunion-européenne-en-bosnie-herzégovineappeal-staff-coming-under-the-common-foreign-and-security-policy-cfsp-international-contract-staff-member-hired-by-the-european-union-special-representative-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-termination-of-the-employment-contract-following-the-withdrawal-of-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-from-the-european-union-appeal-brought-by-a-member-state-which-did-not-intervene-in-the-proceedings-before-the-general-court-third-paragraph-of-article-56-of-the-statute-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-admissibility-of-the-appeal-</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349727]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026CO0068_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against DK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(1) and (2) – Right to be present at the trial – Express or tacit but unequivocal waiver – National legislation interpreted as allowing a person who is the subject of criminal prosecution to be kept in detention in order for his or her right to be present at the trial to be safeguarded.#Case C-68/26 PPU.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62026co0068-sum-order-of-the-court-fifth-chamber-of-27-march-2026criminal-proceedings-against-dkrequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sofiyski-gradski-sadreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-urgent-preliminary-ruling-procedure-area-of-freedom-security-and-justice-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-judicial-cooperation-in-criminal-matters-directive-eu-2016343-article-81-and-2-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-express-or-tacit-but-unequivocal-waiver-national-legislation-interpreted-as-allowing-a-person-who-is-the-subject-of-criminal-prosecution-to-be-kept-in-detention-in-order-for-his-or-her-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-to-be-safeguardedcase-c-6826-ppu</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62026co0068-sum-order-of-the-court-fifth-chamber-of-27-march-2026criminal-proceedings-against-dkrequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sofiyski-gradski-sadreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-urgent-preliminary-ruling-procedure-area-of-freedom-security-and-justice-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-judicial-cooperation-in-criminal-matters-directive-eu-2016343-article-81-and-2-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-express-or-tacit-but-unequivocal-waiver-national-legislation-interpreted-as-allowing-a-person-who-is-the-subject-of-criminal-prosecution-to-be-kept-in-detention-in-order-for-his-or-her-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-to-be-safeguardedcase-c-6826-ppu</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349726]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[Menjalni tečaj za ruski rubelj za mesec AVGUST 2026]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/menjalni-te%c4%8daj-za-ruski-rubelj-za-mesec-avgust-2026</link><description><![CDATA[ Obveščamo vas, da je menjalni tečaj za izračun carinske vrednosti blaga iz ruskega rublja v evro, za mesec avgust 89,45248. ]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/menjalni-te%c4%8daj-za-ruski-rubelj-za-mesec-avgust-2026</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349725]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026CO0013: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62026co0013-order-of-the-court-tenth-chamber-of-15-july-2026emilio-de-capitani-v-council-of-the-european-unionappeal-article-181-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-access-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-working-documents-issued-by-the-general-secretariat-of-the-council-of-the-european-union-no-publication-in-the-councils-register-of-documents-submitted-following-a-request-for-access-article-10-and-article-168-teu-article-15-tfeu-no-implied-refusal-to-publish-no-challengeable-act-appeal-in-part-manifestly-inadmissible-and-in-part-manifestly-unfoundedcase-c-1326-p</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:36:06 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/Sporočila/celex62026co0013-order-of-the-court-tenth-chamber-of-15-july-2026emilio-de-capitani-v-council-of-the-european-unionappeal-article-181-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-access-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-working-documents-issued-by-the-general-secretariat-of-the-council-of-the-european-union-no-publication-in-the-councils-register-of-documents-submitted-following-a-request-for-access-article-10-and-article-168-teu-article-15-tfeu-no-implied-refusal-to-publish-no-challengeable-act-appeal-in-part-manifestly-inadmissible-and-in-part-manifestly-unfoundedcase-c-1326-p</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-349719]]></dc:identifier></item></channel></rss>