Search
× Search
Menu
    1. User Profile New
    2. Privacy policy
    1. Svetovanje - davčno materialno pravo
    2. Davčno svetovanje - davčno procesno pravo
    3. Svetovanje - Korporacijsko pravo
    4. Drugo mnenje v davčnih zadevah
    5. Izobraževanja iz davčnega, korporacijskega in povezanega prava podjetij
    1. Izvajanje storitev Računovodenja v Mreži Modro Poslovanje
    1. Kontakti TAXIN d.o.o. - Partner svetovalci za davčno in poslovno svetovanje
    2. TAXIN - PRICE LIST2024
    3. Kontakti MODRO JUTRO D.O.O. - Partner izvajalec računovodskih storitev
    1. Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....
    2. Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA
    3. mag. Derganc Franc BLOG
    1. WBN-info
    2. GGF Apartmani, GGF 4 YOU doživetje
    3. Pridružite se Svetovalcem in Izvajalcem mreže modro poslovanje
    4. Povpraševanje za računovodenje v Mreži modro poslovanje
    5. Želim analizo skladnosti poslovanja podjetij - 001MMP
    6. Želim storitev DRUGO MNENJE V DAVČNIH ZADEVAH oz. davčni ali poslovni nasvet
    7. Dogodki Modro Poslovanje

UPRS Sodba I U 1597/2022-15

Tožnik je svoj dolg, ki je bil predmet prvotne odločbe z dne 28. 7. 2011, v celoti poravnal že na podlagi prve izdane odločbe še preden je 1. 1. 2017 začela veljati sprememba zakona (ZDavP-2J) in z njo višja obrestna mera. Zato so bila utemeljena tožnikova pričakovanja, da se njegov položaj po vloženi pritožbi ne more poslabšati. Z uporabo (višje) obrestne mere, ki je veljala v času ponovnega odločanja, je bilo zato po presoji sodišča v nasprotju z 2. členom Ustave poseženo v tožnikova upravičena pričakovanja in s tem v njegovo zaupanje v pravo.
marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sodba X Ips 7/2024

Zakon glede povračila stroškov postopka, začetega po uradni dolžnosti, vzpostavlja merilo končnega uspeha, kar pomeni, da je pri odločanju o povrnitvi stroškov upošteven le uspeh stranke na koncu celotnega postopka. Tako je z vidika pravice do povračila stroškov nepomembno, ali in koliko stranka uspe s posameznim dejanjem v postopku, na primer s pritožbo, pač pa je ključno, da uspešna pritožba vodi tudi v sprejem za stranko ugodnejše odločitve. Ugodnost zaključka postopka z vidika pravice do povrnitve stroškov je treba presojati glede na to, kakšna obveznost je oziroma bi bila zakonito naložena v trenutku izdaje prvostopenjskega upravnega akta. Če pride do prenehanja ali zmanjšanja strankine obveznosti zaradi dejstev, ki so nastala kasneje (na primer pride do zastaranja obveznosti; stranka v pritožbenem postopku ali v ponovljenem postopku na prvi stopnji svojo obveznost prostovoljno izpolni), to ne vpliva na končni uspeh stranke, zato tudi ne bo...
marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 162/2024-5, enako tudi VSRS Sklep X DoR 182/2024-5, VSRS Sklep X DoR 187/2024-5

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je mogoče v odmernem postopku davka, na podlagi pravočasne priglasitve odsvojitve kapitala (davčne napovedi za odmero davka) po 326. členu ZDavP-2 uveljavljati tudi odlog ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti po 100. členu ZDoh-2?
marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

Osnovne informacije na začetku podjetniške poti - fizične osebe z dejavnostjo

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

Osnovne informacije na začetku podjetniške poti - pravne osebe

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D01688: Council Decision of 11 March 2025 appointing three representatives of Member States as alternate members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D0492: Council Decision (Euratom) 2025/492 of 18 February 2025 approving a Commission regulation on the application of Euratom safeguards

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R0568R(02): Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/568 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 February 2024 on fees and charges payable to the European Medicines Agency, amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2022/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EU) No 658/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95 (OJ L, 2024/568, 14.2.2024)

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32019R0834R(04)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D0504: Council Decision (EU) 2025/504 of 11 March 2025 amending Protocol No 5 on the Statute of the European Investment Bank

marec 14, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0271_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#XT and Others v Keolis Agen SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Carry-over of entitlements to paid annual leave in the event of long-term illness – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 31(2).#Joined Cases C-271/22 to C-274/22.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0485:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 12 mars 2025.#Royaume de Suède contre Commission européenne.#FEAGA et Feader – Dépenses exclues du financement – Admissibilité des parcelles déclarées par la Suède – Dépenses effectuées au cours des exercices financiers 2017-2019 – Corrections financières – Contrôles clés – Contrôles croisés et mise à jour du système d’identification des parcelles agricoles – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation concernant l’existence d’une non‑conformité dans un contrôle clé – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-485/22.

This document does not exist in English.
marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CC0653: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 13 March 2025.###

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0230: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#MF v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Principle of equivalence – Mortgage loan agreements – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Action for invalidity – Limitation period for an action seeking repayment of sums paid but not due – Actions seeking, respectively, a declaration that a contractual term is invalid and seeking to enforce the restitutory effects of such a declaration subject to different limitation periods.#Case C-230/24.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0271: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine, or which obstruct the work of international organisations in Ukraine.#Case C-271/24 P.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0247: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#VP v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(d) – Principle of accuracy – Article 16 – Right to rectification – Article 23 – Restrictions – Data relating to gender identity – Data incorrect from the time of inclusion in a public register – Means of proof – Administrative practice of requesting proof of gender reassignment surgery.#Case C-247/23.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0044: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-44/23 P.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Cassella-med GmbH & Co.KG and MCM Klosterfrau Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH v Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(2)(b) – Concept of ‘medicinal product by function’ – Concept of ‘pharmacological action’ – Binding of a substance, in a reversible manner, to bacteria to prevent them from adhering to human cells – Article 2(2) – Applicable legal framework – Classification as a ‘medical device’ or as a ‘medicinal product’ – Medical devices – Directive 93/42/EEC – Article 1(2)(a) – Concept of ‘medical device’.#Case C-589/23.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0120: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#„Unigames“ UAB v Lošimų priežiūros tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(e) and (f) – Concepts of ‘technical regulation’ and ‘rule on services’ – National legislation laying down a prohibition on encouraging participation in gambling, including remote gambling – Article 5(1) – Obligation to notify the European Commission – Amendment of that legislation extending the scope of the prohibition on encouraging gambling – No notification – Consequences.#Case C-120/24.

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0337: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 4(2), Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Point 1(i), (j) and (m) of the Annex to Directive 93/13 – Consumer credit agreements – Term requiring a consumer to conclude a contract of guarantee – Guarantor chosen by the creditor – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Agreement which is ancillary to a credit agreement – Powers of the national court – Order for payment procedure – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Articles 5 and 8 – Annex I – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(g), (i) and (n), Article 10(2), Article 15(2) and Article 23 – Linked cr

marec 13, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First588589590591593595596597Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top