Search
× Search

CELEX:62025TN0399: Case T-399/25: Action brought on 20 June 2025 – KF v Commission

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TB0810: Case T-810/22: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Nobilia v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a pension decision – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Death of the applicant – Proceedings not resumed by successors – No need to adjudicate)

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0428: Case T-428/25: Action brought on 3 July 2025 – KN v Europol

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TB0048: Case T-48/25: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2025 – NFL Properties Europe v EUIPO – Treets (SUPER BOWL) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for revocation – No need to adjudicate)

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TA1173: Case T-1173/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Spin Master Toys UK v EUIPO – Verdes Innovations (Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TB0292: Case T-292/24: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2025 – Beauty Brands Concept v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (EVELINE PROFESSIONAL) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for the trade mark at issue in respect of the contested goods – No need to adjudicate)

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0429: Case T-429/25: Action brought on 3 July 2025 – Dogru and AFA Medya v Council

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0430: Case T-430/25: Action brought on 7 July 2025 – Klein v Commission

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0437: Case T-437/25: Action brought on 9 July 2025 – Empreinte v EUIPO (Shape of a corkscrew)

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0442: Case T-442/25: Action brought on 7 July 2025 – KR v Europol

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0426: Case T-426/25: Action brought on 1 July 2025 – KL v Europol

avgust 25, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TO0645: Order of the President of the General Court of 6 February 2017.#Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Interim measures — Single Resolution Board — Single Resolution Fund — Ex-ante contributions — Application for stay of execution — No urgency.#Case T-645/16 R.

avgust 23, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TJ0157: Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 17 November 2016.#Ingrid Fedtke v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Purely confirmatory act — New substantive facts — Burden of proof.#Case T-157/16 P.

avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TO0466(02): Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 September 2019.#NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board.#Case T-466/16 REC.

avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

Okoljska dajatev za onesnaževanje okolja zaradi uporabe mazalnih olj in tekočin

avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba IV U 91/2022-13

Ni bistveno, kdaj je za izbrisano družbo nastala obveznost plačila DDV in DDPO, temveč je treba upoštevati pravno podlago nastanka tožnikove obveznosti, torej kdaj je nastala terjatev iz naslova odgovornosti tožnika za obveznosti izbrisane družbe. Določilo 408. člena ZFPPIPP namreč posebej govori o terjatvah do (stečajnega) dolžnika, ki so nastale do trenutka postopka osebnega stečaja, zato ga je treba po presoji sodišča razlagati tako, da odpust učinkuje na terjatve, pri katerih je bil stečajni dolžnik do trenutka začetka postopka osebnega stečaja v položaju dolžnika. Sporne obveznosti so bile v premoženjski sferi izbrisane družbe vse do njenega prenehanja, do takrat pa tožnik kot njen družbenik v skladu z izrecnim določilom 472. člena ZGD-1 zanje ni bil odgovoren.
avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

Okoljska dajatev za onesnaževanje okolja zaradi uporabe hlapnih organskih spojin

avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba IV U 100/2022-17

V postopku davčne izvršbe je bistveno le, da je izvršilni naslov postal izvršljiv, kar v obravnavani zadev ni sporno. Tožnik pa ugovarja višini dolgovane obveznosti, navaja namreč, da je navedeno obveznost predhodno že poravnal, toženka pa zatrjuje, da terjana obveznost vse do dne izdaje izpodbijanega sklepa ni bila poravnana.
avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba II U 115/2023-16

Sodišče zaključuje, da je tožena stranka napačno omejila dokazovanje za odločitev relevantnega dejstva dejanske prisotnosti na delovnem mestu zgolj na s strani delodajalca potrjen seznam prisotnosti oziroma njegovo izjavo, da takšne listine ne bo izdal, razen tega pa je tudi zmotno tožniku onemogočila dokazovanje, da je dodatna dokazila iz upravičenih razlogov predložil šele v pritožbenem postopku.
avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments

Okoljska dajatev zaradi onesnaževanja okolja zaradi nastajanja izrabljenih gum

avgust 22, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First490491492493495497498499Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top