Search
× Search

CELEX:62025TJ0497: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Almaviva - The Italian Innovation SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MOOVA AlmavivA Group – Earlier EU word mark MOOVIT – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-497/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0501:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Cluster Calzado Innovación contre Commission européenne.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007‑2013) – Convention de subvention relative au projet Sohealthy – Coûts éligibles – Enquête de l’OLAF – Demande de recouvrement et de dommages et intérêts – Note de débit – Recours en annulation – Acte non susceptible de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Prescription – Délai raisonnable – Article 41, paragraphe 4, de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire T-501/24.

This document does not exist in English.
september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0500:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) contre Commission européenne.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007‑2013) – Conventions de subvention relatives aux projets DES‑MOLD, Sohealthy et PILOT‑ABP – Coûts éligibles – Enquête de l’OLAF – Demande de recouvrement et de dommages et intérêts – Note de débit – Recours en annulation – Acte non susceptible de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Prescription – Délai raisonnable – Article 41, paragraphe 4, de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire T

This document does not exist in English.
september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0436:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Agraya GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative Food Pass – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure FoodPLUS – Motif relatif de refus – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-436/25.

This document does not exist in English.
september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0126(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2026.#AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK "Azot" v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Consolidated request for expiry review – Article 11(2), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Standard of proof at the initiation of a review – Preliminary stage of the review procedure – Sufficiency of the evidence – Additional information taken into account based on a different dumping calculation method.#Case T-126/21 RENV.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0551: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Unipreus SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WALLAPOP – Earlier national figurative marks WALA W – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Relevant point in time for assessing the existence of an earlier trade mark.#Case T-551/24.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0244: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Cosmetika S.A.S. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LOTO DEL SVR – Earlier EU word mark SVR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(2) and (4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-244/24.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0496: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Almaviva - The Italian Innovation SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MOOVA AlmavivA Group – Earlier EU word mark MOOVIT – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-496/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0642: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Eurest Colectividades, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark FISH REVOLUTION – Earlier EU trade mark CANNED TUNA REVOLUTION ! – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-642/24.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0457: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Hungary v Council of the European Union and Facilité européenne pour la paix.#Common foreign and security policy – European Peace Facility (EPF) – Decision of the EPF Committee on the allocation to the Ukrainian Armed Forces of the first instalment of the extraordinary revenues from frozen Russian assets – Lack of jurisdiction on the part of the EU judicature.#Case T-457/24.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0495: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Almaviva - The Italian Innovation SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MOOVA AlmavivA Group – Earlier EU word mark MOOVIT – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-495/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0351: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Nord Est Asset Management SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NEA – Earlier EU figurative mark NEAM – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-351/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0574: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Nutristar SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NUTRISTAR – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Declaration of revocation – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof.#Case T-574/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0608: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Modus AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark papyros by Modus – International registration of the earlier word mark PAPYRUS – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-608/25.

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0852:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#J.L.Q. contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) et Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-852/25.

This document does not exist in English.
september 10, 2026 0 Comments

OJ:C_202604820: Judgment of the Court of 28 April 2026 in Case E-17/25 – Redd Ullevål Sykehus v the Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development (Staten v/ Kommunal- og distriktdepartementet) (Directive 2001/42/EC (Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive) – Plans and programmes – Environmental assessment – Reasonable alternatives – Regularisation)

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026B1567: Decision (EU, Euratom) 2026/1567 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024, Section III – Commission and executive agencies and the ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026B1685: Decision (EU) 2026/1685 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on the closure of the accounts of the Chips Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2024

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026B1669: Decision (EU) 2026/1669 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on the closure of the accounts of the Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2024

september 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026B1676: Decision (EU) 2026/1676 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2024

september 10, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
First3839404143454647Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top