Search
× Search

CELEX:32025R1256: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1256 of 23 June 2025 implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

junij 23, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D1255: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1255 of 23 June 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

junij 23, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0415: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#OHB System AG v European Commission.#Case C-415/23 P.

junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0335:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 11 juin 2025.#Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA contre Agence exécutive européenne pour le climat, les infrastructures et l’environnement.#Recours en annulation – Transports – Mécanisme pour l’interconnexion en Europe (MIE) – Appel à propositions CEF‑T‑2023‑COREGEN – Projet « Tren de Gran Canaria » – Rejet de la proposition du requérant pour non-respect des conditions de recevabilité – Présentation tardive d’un document exigé par l’appel à propositions – Demande de réexamen – Compétence liée – Incompétence manifeste partielle – Recours en partie manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-335/24.

This document does not exist in English.
junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0480(03):           Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 10 juin 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2019 – Obligation de motivation – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Égalité de traitement – Principe de proportionnalité – Marge d’appréciation du CRU – Exception d’illégalité – Marge d’appréciation de la Commission – Article 70, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-480/19.

This document does not exist in English.
junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0800: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0479(03):           Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 10 juin 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2019 – Détermination du niveau cible annuel – Plafond prévu à l’article 70, paragraphe 2, premier et quatrième alinéas, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être entendu – Principe de sécurité juridique – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Exception d’illégalité – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-

This document does not exist in English.
junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62018TO0414(04):           Beschluss des Gerichts (Zehnte erweiterte Kammer) vom 10. Juni 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG gegen Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss.#Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion – Bankenunion – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsmechanismus für Kreditinstitute und bestimmte Wertpapierfirmen (SRM) – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsfonds (SRF) – Beschluss des SRB über die Berechnung der für 2018 im Voraus erhobenen Beiträge – Bestimmung der jährlichen Zielausstattung – Obergrenze nach Art. 70 Abs. 2 Unterabs. 1 und 4 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 806/2014 – Begründungspflicht – Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör – Grundsatz der Rechtssicherheit – Anspruch auf effektiven gerichtlichen Rechtsschutz – Einrede der Rechtswidrigkeit – Klage, der offensichtlich jede rechtliche Grundlage fehlt.#Rechtssac

This document does not exist in English.
junij 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0509(01)_RES: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2025.#Research Investments s. r. o. and Others v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Letters from the European Delegated Prosecutor – Article 42(1) to (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-509/24.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0741_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0804(02): Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0288_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Case T-288/22.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0332_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Azaconsa SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-332/23.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0134:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 10 juin 2025.#Blue Underwriting Agency SpA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-134/25 P.

This document does not exist in English.
junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0021: Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-21/25 P.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0615: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2025.#Asociación de ciudadanos contra la corrupción y para la defensa del estado de derecho v European Ombudsman.#Action for annulment – Decision of the Ombudsman not to open an inquiry following a complaint – Act not open to challenge – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-615/24.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0465_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament.#Case T-465/23.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

Napoved za odmero akontacije dohodnine od dohodka iz delovnega razmerja (DohZap1) – napaka pri oddaji napovedi

Obveščamo vas, da smo od 18.6.2025 do 20.6.2025 na eDavkih zaznavali napako, ki je onemogoča oddajo napovedi za odmero akontacije dohodnine od dohodka iz delovnega razmerja (DohZap1), in sicer v primerih izplačil regresa za letni dopust, plačila plače za poslovno uspešnost in uveljavljanja povračil stroškov za dohodke prejete iz tujine.

Napaka je odpravljena.

Zaradi zaznane napake pri oddaji napovedi DohZap1 se zavezancu zamudne obresti zaradi prepozno vložene napovedi ne bodo obračunale, temveč se bo napoved upoštevala kot pravočasno vložena.
 

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

Menjalni tečaj za ruski rubelj za mesec JULIJ 2025

Obveščamo vas, da je menjalni tečaj za izračun carinske vrednosti blaga iz ruskega rublja v evro, za mesec julij 90,5021.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments

Menjalni tečaj za ruski rubelj za mesec JULIJ 2025

Obveščamo vas, da je menjalni tečaj za izračun carinske vrednosti blaga iz ruskega rublja v evro, za mesec julij 90,5021.

junij 20, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First325326327328330332333334Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top