Search
× Search

CELEX:62025TN0539: Case T-539/25: Action brought on 6 August 2025 – RM v Parliament

oktober 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CB0686: Case C-686/24, Nidec Asi and Ceisis: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Nidec Asi SpA, Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection)

oktober 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0449: Case T-449/25: Action brought on 8 July 2025 – Tauber v Council

oktober 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CN0504: Case C-504/25, Acciaierie d’Italia – II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 22 July 2025 – Acciaierie d’Italia SpA, in amministrazione straordinaria v Cassa per i servizi energetici e ambientali (CSEA)

oktober 13, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TO0025(01):           Beschluss des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 7. Oktober 2025 (Auszüge).#Orgatex GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Verfahren – Kostenfestsetzung – Von einem am Rechtsstreit nicht beteiligten Dritten gezahlte Kosten – Erstattungsfähigkeit für eine Partei.#Rechtssache T-25/23 DEP.

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba III U 225/2021-70

Da je ponudba za prodajo kmetijskega zemljišča, gozda ali kmetije zavezujoča, je v Načelnem pravnem mnenju presodilo tudi Vrhovno sodišče na občni seji dne 6. 4. 2012 (v nadaljevanju Načelno pravno mnenje), temu pa je sledila tudi sodna praksa (npr. v sodbah Upravnega sodišča II U 394/2015 z dne 12. 10. 2016, I U 1144/2016 z dne 14. 11. 2017, I U 2601/2017 z dne 8. 1. 2019, II U 366/2018 z dne 19. 4. 2021, sodba in sklep I U 2014/2020 z dne 21. 12. 2022, in druge). Kot je utemeljilo Vrhovno sodišče, je ponudba za prodajo kmetijskega zemljišča, gozda ali kmetije, dana na podlagi 20. člena ZKZ, v razmerju do predkupnih upravičencev zavezujoča in ponudnik vezanosti nanjo ne more izključiti na način iz prvega odstavka 25. člena OZ, pravni posel pa je sklenjen pod odložnim pogojem odobritve s strani upravne enote, ko upravna enota prejme izjavo o sprejemu ponudbe (tretji odstavek 21. člena ZKZ).
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 58/2025-3

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Kdaj začne teči zastaralni rok za odmero davka od nenapovedanih dohodkov po 68.a členu ZDavP-2?
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba III U 220/2024-47

Sodišče pri ponovnem odločanju o zakonitosti izpodbijane odločbe najprej ugotavlja, da je ta v delu, v katerem je tožnici odmerjeno nadomestilo za rabo vode oziroma plačilo za vodno pravico za leta 2005 do 2007, nezakonita. Ker je Ustavno sodišče z odločbo U-I-348/20 z dne 30. 5. 2024 razveljavilo peti odstavek in tretjo alinejo šestega odstavka 199.b člena ZV-1 ter prvi odstavek in prvo poved drugega odstavka v zvezi s petim odstavkom 199.e člena ZV-1, kolikor se na njihovi podlagi za čas pred 1. 1. 2008 lahko zaračuna nadomestilo za rabo vode oziroma plačilo za vodno pravico za rabo vode za proizvodnjo pijač, ki se odvzema iz objektov in naprav, namenjenih oskrbi s pitno vodo, teh določb v tej zadevi, v kateri še ni pravnomočno odločeno (44. člena ZUstS), ni mogoče uporabiti. Sodišče ugotavlja, da je tudi odmera plačila tožničine vodne pravice za leto 2008 zastarala. Sodišče je pri tem upoštevalo stališče Ustavnega sodišča U-I-348/20 z dne 30. 5. 2024,...
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D2065: Council Decision (EU) 2025/2065 of 29 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OACPS-EU Council of Ministers as regards the adoption of Joint Guidelines for the conduct of the partnership dialogue provided for in Article 3 of the Samoa Agreement

oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D2066: Council Decision (EU) 2025/2066 of 29 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OACPS-EU Council of Ministers, the Africa-EU Council of Ministers, the Caribbean-EU Council of Ministers, the Pacific-EU Council of Ministers, the OACPS-EU Ambassadorial Level Senior Officials Committee, the Africa-EU Joint Committee, the Caribbean-EU Joint Committee and the Pacific-EU Joint Committee as regards the adoption of their Rules of Procedure

oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32024L2749R(03)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32013R1308R(28)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32022L2556R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32014L0068R(08)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
oktober 10, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0013:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 1er octobre 2025.#OU contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Défaut de clarté et de précision des moyens – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-13/25 P.

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0368:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Inexécution – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Environnement – Directives 2008/98/CE et 1999/31/CE – Déchets – Décharge sur l’île de Zakynthos (Grèce) – Obligation de désaffecter cette décharge n’ayant pas obtenu l’autorisation requise – Sanctions pécuniaires – Astreinte – Somme forfaitaire.#Affaire C-368/24.

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0483:           Conclusions de l'avocat général Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 9 octobre 2025.###

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0798: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Minister for Justice v SH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedure between Member States – European arrest warrant – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Mandatory execution – Exceptions – Concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ – Additional sentence of police supervision – Breach of the conditions imposed in connection with that supervision – Decision converting police supervision into a custodial sentence – Sentence handed down in absentia.#Case C-798/23.

oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0798_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Minister for Justice v SH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedure between Member States – European arrest warrant – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Mandatory execution – Exceptions – Concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ – Additional sentence of police supervision – Breach of the conditions imposed in connection with that supervision – Decision converting police supervision into a custodial sentence – Sentence handed down in absentia.#Case C-798/23.

oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0080: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Zwrotybankowe.pl sp. z o.o. v Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 22(2) – Imperative nature of that directive – Assignment to a third party by a consumer of his or her claim against a bank – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Examination by a national court of its own motion of the unfairness of the terms in a claim assignment agreement which is not subject to an ongoing dispute before that court.#Case C-80/24.

oktober 9, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First230231232233235237238239Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top