Search
× Search

CELEX:62024CO0827:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 2 septembre 2025.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca et Autoritatea Vamală Română prin Direcţia Regională Vamală Cluj contre Direct Line Inox Impex SRL e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Politique commerciale commune – Droits antidumping – Importation de tuyaux sans soudure, en acier inoxydable, originaires de Chine, étirés à froid en Inde – Règlement (UE) 2016/1036 – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Contournement – Exclusion – Modification essentielle – Union douanière – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Code des douanes de l’Union – Article 60, paragraphe 2 – Acquisition de l’origine des marchandise

This document does not exist in English.
september 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0625:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-625/24.

This document does not exist in English.
september 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0019:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-19/25.

This document does not exist in English.
september 12, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 34/2025-3

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: "Ali je pravilno stališče Upravnega sodišča, da izdaja zapisnika, ki vsebuje vsa pravno pomembna dejstva ter pravno podlago, na kateri nato temelji izdana odločba, in je imel zavezanec možnost na zapisnik podati pripombe ter po njegovi izdaji ni bil prekludiran pri navajanju novih dejstev in predlaganju novih dokazov, ne zagotavlja pravice do izjave, če ni bil zavezanec pred tem izrecno seznanjen z relevantno pravno podlago?"
september 12, 2025 0 Comments

Finančna uprava na dogodku AmCham Komisije za spodbujanje investicij

september 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025B1565: Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2025/1565 of Amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2025

september 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R1263R(03)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
september 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0215_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordere

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CC0195: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0311: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0038: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0115: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#UJ v Österreichische Zahnärztekammer.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(d) and (e) – Provision of healthcare through telemedicine – Concept of ‘telemedicine’ – Cross-border healthcare provided through telemedicine – Complex medical treatment that includes healthcare provided in person and through telemedicine – Member State of treatment – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society service – Directive 2005/36/EC – Professional qualifications – Freedom to provide services – Scope – Article 56 TFEU.#Case C-115/24.

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0471: Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0005: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#P.M. v S. Snc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2 – Discrimination based on disability – Dismissal of a worker on sick leave – National legislation laying down the same limit of number of days of sick leave per calendar year for all workers in the same sector of activity – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation.#Case C-5/24.

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0384: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Derogations – Article 4(1)(a), (b) and (d) – Release of certain frozen funds for specific expenses – Payment of a roll fee and a flat-rate contribution for the purpose of instituting an action for annulment against a decision implementing that regulation – Included.#Case C-384/24.

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0010: Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0687_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#D.E. v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/59/EU – Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – General principles – Article 34(1)(a) and (b) – Bail-in – Write-down of capital instruments – Effects – Article 53(1) and (3) – Article 60(2), first subparagraph, points (b) and (c) – Protection of the rights of shareholders and creditors – Purchase of capital instruments – Flawed and incorrect information provided in the prospectus to be published, inter alia, when securities are offered to the public – Action for a declaration of nullity in respect of the agreement for the purchase of capital instruments – Action for damages – Actions brought before the adoption o

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0196: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0472: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 September 2025.###

september 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0341: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Duca di Salaparuta SpA v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of the market in wine – Community framework for the protection of wine names – Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 – Article 54 – Quality wines produced in specified regions (quality wines psr) – Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 – Article 43(2) and Article 51 – Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 – Article 118k(2) and Article 118s – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 101(2) and Article 107 – Protection, under EU law, of quality wines psr recognised under national law – Conflict between a protected wine name and an earlier well-known mark containing a

september 11, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First214215216217219221222223Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top