Search
× Search

CELEX:62025TJ0231_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-231/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0591: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#„Golf Bulgaria“ EOOD v Savet za elektronni medii.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media services – Article 1(1)(a)(i) – Concept of ‘audiovisual media services’ – Article 6(1) – Protection of human dignity – National legislation prohibiting broadcasts contrary to accepted standards of morality – Liability of the service provider – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 11 – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) – Limitation of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case C-591/24.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0175_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Özkan Demir Çelik Sanayi AŞ v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of steel bulb flats originating in China and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/209 – Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Currency conversions – Article 2(4), (10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Ordinary course of trade – Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value – Quarterly dumping margin calculation).#Case T-175/24.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0564_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Heinz Reinwald and HK Evolution LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MAP – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Examination limited to the grounds and arguments submitted by the parties – Second sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-564/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0574_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Nutristar SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NUTRISTAR – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Declaration of revocation – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof.#Case T-574/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0376_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0879_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 15 octobre 2026.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Danemark.#Manquement d’État – Directive (UE) 2017/2397 – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles dans le domaine de la navigation intérieure – Article 39, paragraphe 3 – Obligation de transposition limitée – Article 39, paragraphe 4 – Exemption à l’obligation de transposition en cas de navigation intérieure techniquement impossible – Directive (UE) 2021/1233 – Mesures transitoires pour la reconnaissance de certificats de pays tiers – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Défaut de communication des mesures de transposition – Article 260, paragraphe 3, TFUE – Demande de condamnation au paiement d’une somme forfaitaire et d’une astreinte.#Affaire C-879/24.

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0001: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Article 266 TFEU – Judgment of the General Court of the European Union annulling the decision not to include the appellant’s name on the reserve list for a competition – Infringement of the principle of the stability of the selection board – Implementation of that judgment by means of financial compensation – Refusal to apply a corrective factor in order to include the appellant’s name on that reserve list – Refusal to apply other non-pecuniary measures of compensation – Action for annulment and compensation – Method of determining that financial compensation – Obligation to take into account loss of opportunity – Method of determining the

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0627: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 15 October 2026.###

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0879:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 15 octobre 2026.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Danemark.#Manquement d’État – Directive (UE) 2017/2397 – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles dans le domaine de la navigation intérieure – Article 39, paragraphe 3 – Obligation de transposition limitée – Article 39, paragraphe 4 – Exemption à l’obligation de transposition en cas de navigation intérieure techniquement impossible – Directive (UE) 2021/1233 – Mesures transitoires pour la reconnaissance de certificats de pays tiers – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Défaut de communication des mesures de transposition – Article 260, paragraphe 3, TFUE – Demande de condamnation au paiement d’une somme forfaitaire et d’une astreinte.#Affaire C-879/24.

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0275: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Finanzamt B v A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Privileges and immunities of the European Union – Article 343 TFEU – Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Officials and other servants of the European Union – Article 12 – Exemption from national taxes – Gift tax – First paragraph of Article 13 – Liability to that tax in the official’s Member State of residence which is neither the State of origin nor the State in which that official performs his or her duties – Domicile for tax purposes of officials and other servants of the European Union.#Case C-275/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0580: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v LY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 12 – Keeping the requested person in detention – Article 23 – Time limit for the surrender of that person – National legislation which lays down an obligation to detain the requested person in a prison until his or her surrender to the issuing Member State – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to liberty and security.#Case C-580/24.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0321: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v „А“ and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Article 325(1) TFEU – ‘PIF’ Convention – Article 2(1) TFEU – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Article 2(a) and (b) – Serious fraud in relation to value added tax – Agreement to commit an offence – Article 3 – Obligation on the part of the Member States to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union through effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Maximum penalty duration – Principle of proportionalit

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0070: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#N.O. v PKO BP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Unauthorised payment transactions – Article 73 – Payment service provider’s liability – Article 74 – Payer’s liability – Obligation of the payment service provider to refund immediately – Scope – Allocation of liability between the payment service provider and the payer – Article 69 – Obligations of the payment service user – Gross negligence – Refusal by the payment service provider to refund immediately to the payer the amount of an unauthorised transaction on the ground that that payer made that transaction possible through gross negligence.#Case C-70/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CC0410: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 15 October 2026.###

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0402: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Plungės rajono savivaldybės administracija v Viešųjų pirkimų tarnyba.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Award of contracts – Article 57(4), first subparagraph, point (h), and Article 57(6) and (7) – Facultative grounds for exclusion from participation in a procurement procedure – Submission by an economic operator of false information on meeting capacity conditions – Inclusion on a list of providers that have provided false information during a public procurement procedure – Article 18(1) – Principle of proportionality – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-402/25.

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0203_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#„NEO GROUP“ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 2011/96/EU – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Exemption from withholding tax on dividends distributed by a resident subsidiary to a non-resident parent company – Article 1(2) and (3) – Anti-abuse provision – Non-genuine arrangement – Steps of an arrangement – Chain of transactions – Objective analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances – Beneficial owner of dividends – Tax advantage – Lack of relevance of the Member State or of the stage where that advantage is obtained –

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0199:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 15. Oktober 2026.#Fluvius Halle-Vilvoorde, anciennement Sibelgas u. a. gegen De Vlaamse Nutsregulator, anciennement de Vlaamse Regulator van de Elektriciteits-en Gasmarkt (VREG).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Elektrizitätsbinnenmarkt – Verordnung (EU) 2019/943 – Art. 18 Abs. 1 – Richtlinie (EU) 2019/944 – Art. 9, Art. 57 Abs. 4 und 5 sowie Art. 59 Abs. 1 Buchst. a – Entgelte für den Netzzugang, die Nutzung und den Ausbau der Netze – Damit nicht zusammenhängende Kosten zur Unterstützung damit nicht zusammenhängender politischer Ziele – Nationale Regelung, wonach die gemeinwirtschaftliche Verpflichtungen betreffenden Kosten, die den Verteilernetzbetreibern auferlegt werden, in den Netzentgelten zu berücksichtigen sin

This document does not exist in English.
oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CJ0203: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#„NEO GROUP“ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 2011/96/EU – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Exemption from withholding tax on dividends distributed by a resident subsidiary to a non-resident parent company – Article 1(2) and (3) – Anti-abuse provision – Non-genuine arrangement – Steps of an arrangement – Chain of transactions – Objective analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances – Beneficial owner of dividends – Tax advantage – Lack of relevance of the Member State or of the stage where that advantage is obtained – Sub

oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32018L2001R(14)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
oktober 16, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
245678910Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top