Search
× Search

CELEX:62026TN0338: Case T-338/26: Action brought on 29 May 2026 – Addiko Bank v ECB

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026TN0375: Case T-375/26: Action brought on 15 June 2026 – TU v Court of Justice of the European Union

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026TN0335: Case T-335/26: Action brought on 29 May 2026 – Goldwind Science & Technology v Commission

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026TN0376: Case T-376/26: Action brought on 12 June 2026 – TV v Parliament

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CA0760: Case C-760/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 – Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Family membership criterion)

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R3005R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026D1783: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1783 of 12 June 2026 abrogating Council Decision (EU) 2024/2128 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Malta

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:31996L0053R(04)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026D04226: Council Decision of 13 July 2026 appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32021R0998R(01):           Rectificatif au règlement d’exécution (UE) 2021/998 du Conseil du 21 juin 2021 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n° 401/2013 concernant des mesures restrictives instituées en raison de la situation au Myanmar/en Birmanie (JO L 219 I du 21.6.2021)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32021D1000R(02):           Rectificatif à la décision (PESC) 2021/1000 du Conseil du 21 juin 2021 modifiant la décision 2013/184/PESC concernant des mesures restrictives instituées en raison de la situation au Myanmar/en Birmanie (JO L 219 I du 21.6.2021)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
avgust 3, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0075_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.#Case C-75/24 P.

avgust 1, 2026 0 Comments

Neustrezen prikaz opozorila o neusklajenosti podatkov v Evidenci obračunanega DDV in odbitka DDV

V primerih, ko davčni zavezanci zaradi predložitve obračuna DDV po izteku predpisanega roka uveljavljajo samoprijavo po 88.c členu ZDDV-1, se v stolpcu »Opomba« lahko neustrezno izpisuje obvestilo o neusklajenosti med obračunom DDV-O in evidencami za posamezno davčno obdobje.

Opozorilo se izpisuje tudi v določenih primerih, ko so podatki v obračunu DDV v razdelku V. Samoprijava/popravek in podatki v evidencah dejansko usklajeni. Gre torej za napako v prikazu, ki ne odraža nujno dejanskega stanja podatkov.

Napaka je v odpravljanju.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

Neustrezen prikaz opozorila o neusklajenosti podatkov v Evidenci obračunanega DDV in odbitka DDV

V primerih, ko davčni zavezanci zaradi predložitve obračuna DDV po izteku predpisanega roka uveljavljajo samoprijavo po 88.c členu ZDDV-1, se v stolpcu »Opomba« lahko neustrezno izpisuje obvestilo o neusklajenosti med obračunom DDV-O in evidencami za posamezno davčno obdobje.

Opozorilo se izpisuje tudi v določenih primerih, ko so podatki v obračunu DDV v razdelku V. Samoprijava/popravek in podatki v evidencah dejansko usklajeni. Gre torej za napako v prikazu, ki ne odraža nujno dejanskega stanja podatkov.

Napaka je v odpravljanju.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.

This document does not exist in English.
julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0671_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25.

This document does not exist in English.
julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0267_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0732_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0412_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 June 2026.#Parkster AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-412/25.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.

julij 31, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
First7273747577798081Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top