Search
× Search

CELEX:32025D0690: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/690 of 4 April 2025 amending Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran

april 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0350_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2025 (Extracts).#Rems Kargins v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – State aid – Intervention of the Commission as amicus curiae before a national court – Unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the EU institution – Plea of illegality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Principles of separation of powers, independence of national courts, right to an effective remedy, impartiality and neutrality.#Case T-350/23.

april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0349: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2025.#WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Requests sent to EUIPO concerning the processing of the applicant’s personal data – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-349/24.

april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TO0227(01)_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 février 2024.#Mylan Ireland Ltd contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Médicaments à usage humain – Autorisation de mise sur le marché – Demande de mesures provisoires – Demande d’injonction – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-227/23.

This document does not exist in English.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0086: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 April 2025.#Maurice Taylor v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Rectification of the contested acts – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-86/25 R.

april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0018: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 April 2025.#Apellis Europe BV v European Commission.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for Syfovre – Pegcetacoplan – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-18/25 R.

april 4, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 38/2024-12

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali se lahko v verigi tristranskih poslov dobavitelj (drugi v verigi) blaga, ki je bilo z enim prevozom dobavljeno (tj. dano na razpolago oziroma v last) kupčevemu kupcu (in ne tretjemu v verigi), lahko sklicuje na administrativno poenostavitev za tristranske posle iz četrtega odstavka 23. člena ter 48. in 76. člena ZDDV-1 oziroma iz 42., 141. in 197. člena Direktive o DDV?
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sklep I U 1166/2018-29

V zadevi je prišlo do očitne pomote, ker v I. točki izreka sodbe ni bilo dostavka, da se odprava in vrnitev v ponovni postopek nanaša le na obrestni del izpodbijane odločbe. Pri tem pa je bilo že iz obrazložitve sodbe razvidno, da odločitev sodišča temelji izključno na očitku napačne uporabe materialnega prava zaradi obračuna obresti po 7 % letni obrestni meri namesto po predhodno veljavni, nižji obrestni meri. Volja sodišča, da izpodbijano odločbo odpravi v obrestnem delu, je bila torej jasna, vendar je bilo to v izreku pomotoma izpuščeno.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 884/2021

V zadevi tako ni sporno, da tožnik ni izkazal, da je bilo blago dostavljeno neposredno tožnikovemu kupcu oziroma dobavljeno prejemniku nadalje dobave, kot je to tožnik poročal, torej neposredno tretjemu v verigi. Tako sta bili znotraj enega prevoza, opravljeni več kot dve dobavi, dejanski pridobitelji blaga namreč niso bili tožnikovi kupci, temveč njihovi kupci (kupci kupcev oziroma četrti v verigi), zato tudi po presoji sodišča niso bile izpolnjene vsebinske zahteve za uporabo administrativne poenostavitve za tristranske posle in posledično za oprostitev obravnavanih transakcij tožnika na Danskem kot pridobitev blaga znotraj Unije.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1290/2021-9

Do odloga ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti pride torej zgolj pod pogojem, da davčni zavezanec opcijo odloga izbere in svojo izbiro priglasi davčnemu organ po pravilnih davčnega postopka in v predpisanem roku, davčni organ pa v davčnem postopku z odločbo ugotovi izpolnjenost pogojev in s tem prizna pravico do odloga. Že iz jezikovne razlage prvega do četrtega odstavka 331. člena ZDavP-2, izhaja, da gre za dva ločena in alternativna postopka. Davčni zavezanec torej vloži davčno napoved ali vlogo za odlog ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti, vse v predpisanem roku. Ker gre pri odločanju o odlogu ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti za samostojen postopek, je tudi rok za vložitev vloge za uveljavljanje odloga samostojen.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32023L0959R(07)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D0685: Council Decision (EU) 2025/685 of 27 March 2025 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway amending the Agreement of the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32022L2555R(07)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
april 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0798_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Case T-798/22.

april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0560_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#Case T-560/22.

april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1099_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Ruiz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-1099/23.

april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0235_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Case T-235/22.

april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0700:           Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 26 mars 2025.#QI contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Demande d’assistance – Principe de bonne administration – Devoir de sollicitude – Droit d’être entendu – Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Pourvoi en partie manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-700/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0686: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) v European Commission.#Appeal – Specific programme for research and technological development in the field of research into living resources – SEAPURA project – Grant agreement – Audit report by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Discovery of fraud or financial irregularities – Claim for reimbursement of the European Union contribution – Debit note – Amount receivable by the European Union – Limitation – Contract governed by Belgian law – Opening, in France, of insolvency proceedings against the debtor – Declaration of claim by the European Commission – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 – Direct application – Interruption of the limitation period under Belgian l

april 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0807: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Katharina Plavec v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Lawyers – Lawyer training – Territorial restrictions – National legislation requiring the completion of part of the training period of a trainee lawyer with a lawyer having his or her registered office in the national territory.#Case C-807/23.

april 3, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First496497498499501503504505Last
Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top