avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0128_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts).#Collibra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra – Earlier national word mark Kolibri – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-128/20 and T-129/20.
junij 15, 2022 0 173 CELEX:62020TJ0134_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission.#Case T-134/20.
december 16, 2022 0 105 CELEX:62020TJ0138: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Ciliandra Perkasa v European Commission.#Case T-138/20.
junij 29, 2023 0 68 CELEX:62020TJ0138_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Ciliandra Perkasa v European Commission.#Case T-138/20.
december 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0143: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution – Less than adequate remuneration – Income or price support – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0143_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 December 2022.#PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 – Definitive countervailing duty – Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting – Price pressure – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Causal link – Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution – Less than adequate remuneration – Income or price support – Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 – Benefit – Article 3(1)(a)(i) a
junij 13, 2022 0 179 CELEX:62020TJ0144: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Case T-144/20.
avgust 10, 2022 0 152 CELEX:62020TJ0144_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Case T-144/20.
julij 13, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0150: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 13 juillet 2022.#Tartu Agro AS contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Agriculture – Contrat de bail portant sur des terres agricoles en Estonie – Décision déclarant l’aide incompatible avec le marché intérieur et ordonnant sa récupération – Avantage – Détermination du prix du marché – Principe de l’opérateur privé – Appréciations économiques complexes – Contrôle juridictionnel – Prise en compte de tous les éléments pertinents – Obligation de diligence.#Affaire T-150/20. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020TJ0150_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Tartu Agro AS v European Commission.#State aid – Agriculture – Lease contract for agricultural land in Estonia – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Determination of the market price – Private operator principle – Complex economic assessments – Judicial review – Taking into account of all relevant factors – Duty of diligence.#Case T-150/20.