Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0060_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 29 septembre 2021.#Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Marque verbale MASTIHACARE – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009, [devenu article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001] – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-60/20.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0064: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-64/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0064_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-64/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0069: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024 (Extracts).#Tele Columbus AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-69/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0069_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024 (Extracts).#Tele Columbus AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-69/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0077: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precautiona

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0077_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precaut

RSS
First952953954955957959960961Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top