Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 3

CELEX:62020TA0325: Case T-325/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Unger Marketing International v EUIPO — Orben Wasseraufbereitung (Water purifiers) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing a water purifier — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Declaration of invalidity)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0327: Case T-327/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Shower drainage channel) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel — Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Scope — Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry — Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Identification of the earlier design — Earlier whole design — Determination of the features of the

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0333: Case T-333/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Giuliani (IALO TSP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal — Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0336: Case T-336/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0337: Case T-337/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO (bittorrent) (EU trade mark — Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision — Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Request for conversion into a national trade mark application — Ground precluding conversion — Non-use of the EU trade mark — Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0347: Case T-347/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Sogia Ellas v Commission (State aid — Activities linked to the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products — Aid schemes granted by Greece in the form of interest subsidies and State guarantees on existing and new loans to compensate for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences — Decision declaring the aid schemes incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Aid limited to disaster-hit geographical areas — Advantage — Selectivity — Market economy operator principle — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Length of the procedure — Protection of legitimate expectations — Limitation period — Article 17 o

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0355: Case T-355/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Pokój (Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA — Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

RSS
First924925926927929931932933Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top