Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0306: Case T-306/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González v EUIPO — Ireland and Ornua (La Irlandesa 1943) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court — Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0312: Case T-312/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — EVH v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Due diligence obligation)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0313: Case T-313/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Stadtwerke Leipzig v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0315: Case T-315/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — TEAG v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0317: Case T-317/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — EnergieVerbund Dresden v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0319: Case T-319/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — GGEW v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of diligence)

RSS
First923924925926928930931932Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top