februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0525: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 5. Mai 2022.#Association France Nature Environnement gegen Premier ministre und Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Richtlinie 2000/60/EG – Ordnungsrahmen für Maßnahmen der Europäischen Union im Bereich der Wasserpolitik – Art. 4 Abs. 1 Buchst. a – Umweltziele bei Oberflächengewässern – Verpflichtung der Mitgliedstaaten, die Genehmigung eines Projekts oder Vorhabens zu versagen, das eine Verschlechterung des Zustands eines Oberflächenwasserkörpers verursachen kann – Begriff ‚Verschlechterung‘ des Zustands eines Oberflächenwasserkörpers – Art. 4 Abs. 6 und 7 – Ausnahmen vom Verschlechterungsverbot – Bedingungen – Programme oder Vorhaben mit vorübergehenden Auswir This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0525_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#Association France Nature Environnement v Premier ministre and Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for European Union action in the field of water policy – Article 4(1)(a) – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a programme or project that may cause a deterioration of the status of a body of surface water – Concept of ‘deterioration’ of the status of a body of surface water – Article 4(6) and (7) – Derogations from the prohibition of deterioration – Conditions – Programme or project having temporary, short-term impacts on the status of a body of surface
december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0530: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#SIA „ EUROAPTIEKA” v Ministru kabinets.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 86(1) – Concept of ‘advertising of medicinal products’ – Article 87(3) – Rational use of medicinal products – Article 90 – Prohibited advertising methods – Advertising of medicinal products not subject to medical prescription and not reimbursed – Advertising by price – Advertising of promotional offers – Advertising of bundled sales – Prohibition.#Case C-530/20.
avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0530_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#SIA 'EUROAPTIEKA' v Ministru kabinets.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 86(1) – Concept of ‘advertising of medicinal products’ – Article 87(3) – Rational use of medicinal products – Article 90 – Prohibited advertising methods – Advertising of medicinal products not subject to medical prescription and not reimbursed – Advertising by price – Advertising of promotional offers – Advertising of bundled sales – Prohibition.#Case C-530/20.
april 28, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0531: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.
april 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0531_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0532: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 24 février 2022.#Alstom Transport SA contre Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 92/13/CEE – Procédures de passation des marchés des entités opérant dans les secteurs de l’eau, de l’énergie, des transports et des télécommunications – Article 1er, paragraphes 1 et 3 – Accès aux procédures de recours – Article 2 quater – Délais d’introduction d’un recours – Calcul – Recours contre une décision d’admission d’un soumissionnaire.#Affaire C-532/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0532_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/13/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Article 1(1) and (3) – Access to review procedures – Article 2c – Time limits for applying for review – Calculation – Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate.#Case C-532/20.
marec 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0533: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.