avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0490_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2021.#V.М.А. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon „Pancharevo“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Child born in the host Member State of her parents – Birth certificate issued by that Member State mentioning two mothers in respect of that child – Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to issue a birth certificate for the child in the absence of information as to the identity of the child’s biological mother – Possession of such a certificate being a prerequisite for the issue of an identity card
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0497_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Public procurement – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(1) and (3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judgment of a Member State’s highest administrative court declaring inadmissible, in breach of the case-law of the Court of Justice, an action brought by a tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure – No remedy against that judgment before
marec 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0498: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 10. März 2022.#ZK en qualité de successeur de JM, curateur à la faillite de BMA Nederland BV gegen BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Art. 7 Nr. 2 – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit für Klagen, bei denen eine unerlaubte Handlung oder eine Handlung, die einer unerlaubten Handlung gleichgestellt ist, oder Ansprüche aus einer solchen Handlung den Gegenstand des Verfahrens bilden – Klage eines Insolvenzverwalters gegen einen Dritten im Interesse der Gläubiger – Ort des Eintritts des schädigenden Ereignisses – Art. 8 Nr. 2 – Interventionsklage eines Vertreters kollektiver Interessen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/200 This document does not exist in English.
april 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0498_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ZK v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Claim made by a liquidator against a third party in the interests of creditors – Place where the harmful event occurred – Article 8(2) – Application to intervene by a defendant of collective interests – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Scope – General rule.#Case C-498/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0499: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 97/23/EC – Pressure equipment – CE marking – Placing on the market and putting into service – Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes.#Case C-499/20.
julij 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0500: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 14. Juli 2022.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur Aktiengesellschaft gegen Lokomotion Gesellschaft für Schienentraktion mbH.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Internationale Übereinkünfte – Schienenverkehr – Übereinkommen über den internationalen Eisenbahnverkehr (COTIF) – Einheitliche Rechtsvorschriften für den Vertrag über die Nutzung der Infrastruktur im internationalen Eisenbahnverkehr (CUI) – Art. 4 – Zwingendes Recht – Art. 8 – Haftung des Betreibers – Art. 19 – Sonstige Ansprüche – Zuständigkeit des Gerichtshofs – Beschädigung von Lokomotiven des Beförderers aufgrund einer Entgleisung – Anmietung von Ersatzlokomotiven – Verpflichtung des Infrastrukturbetreibers zur Erstattung der Mietkosten – Vertrag, der durch einen Verweis auf This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0501: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#M P A v LC D N M T.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 3, 6 to 8 and 14 – Definition of ‘habitual residence’ – Jurisdiction, recognition, enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Articles 3 and 7 – Nationals of two different Member States residing in a third State as members of the contract staff working in the EU Delegation to that third State – Determination of jurisdiction – Forum necessitatis.#Case C-501/20.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0501_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#MPA v LCDNMT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 3, 6 to 8 and 14 – Definition of ‘habitual residence’ – Jurisdiction, recognition, enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Articles 3 and 7 – Nationals of two different Member States residing in a third State as members of the contract staff working in the EU Delegation to that third State – Determination of
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0502_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#TP v Institut des Experts en Automobiles.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 5(2) – Automotive expert established in one Member State who moves to the territory of the host Member State in order to pursue, on a temporary and occasional basis, his profession – Refusal of the professional body of the host Member State, in which he was previously established, to enter him in the register of temporary and occasional service providers – Concept of ‘temporary and occasional provision of services’.#Case C-502/20.
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0505: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mai 2022.#RR et JG contre Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Gel et confiscation des instruments et des produits du crime dans l’Union européenne – Directive 2014/42/UE – Article 4 – Confiscation – Article 7 – Gel – Article 8 – Garanties procédurales – Gel et confiscation d’un bien appartenant à une personne tierce à la procédure pénale – Réglementation nationale ne prévoyant pas de recours pour des tiers au cours de la procédure judiciaire et n’admettant pas la restitution éventuelle dudit bien avant la clôture de la procédure pénale.#Affaire C-505/20. This document does not exist in English.