december 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0470: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#AS Veejaam and OÜ Espo v AS Elering.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Renewable energy subsidy – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Incentive effect of aid applied for after work has started on the project concerned – Article 108(3) TFEU – Obligation to notify – Consequences of breach of the obligation to notify.#Case C-470/20.
marec 31, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0472: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 31 mars 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. contre PN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives – Contrats de crédit – Prêt libellé en devise remboursable en monnaie nationale – Clause contractuelle mettant le risque de change à charge du consommateur – Caractère abusif d’une clause se rapportant à l’objet principal du contrat – Effets – Nullité du contrat – Préjudice grave pour le consommateur – Effet utile de la directive 93/13 – Avis non contraignant de la juridiction suprême – Possibilité de rétablir les parties dans la situation qui aurait été la leur si ce contrat n’avait pas été conclu.#Affaire C-472/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0472_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms – Credit agreements – Loan denominated in a foreign currency repayable in national currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the agreement – Effects – Invalidity of the agreement – Serious harm to the consumer – Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 – Non-binding opinion of the highest court – Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that agreement had not been concluded.#Case C-472/20.
oktober 20, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0473: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 octobre 2022.#INVEST FUND MANAGEMENT contre Komisia za finansov nadzor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Directive 2009/65/CE – Organismes de placement collectif en valeurs mobilières (OPCVM) – Sociétés de gestion d’OPCVM – Obligations concernant l’information des investisseurs – Article 72 – Obligation de mise à jour des “éléments essentiels du prospectus” – Portée – Article 69, paragraphe 2 – Renseignements mentionnés dans le schéma A de l’annexe I – Composition d’un organe de la société de gestion – Article 99 bis, sous r) – Transposition dans l’ordre juridique des États membres – Réglementation nationale étendant les situations dans lesquelles une infraction relative à la mise à jour du prospec This document does not exist in English.
september 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0475: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Betting and gambling – Licences for the management of games played on gaming machines – National legislation imposing a levy on licence holders – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Joined Cases C-475/20 to C-481/20.
februar 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0483: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Article 24 – Best interests of the child – No infringement of Artic
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0483_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Artic
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0485: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#XXXX v HR Rail SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post – Staff member completing training as part of recruitment – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities – Requirement to reassign to another post – Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer.#Case C-485/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0487: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#Philips Orăştie S.R.L. contre Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Harmonisation des législations fiscales – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 179 et 183 – Droit à déduction de la TVA – Modalités – Compensation ou remboursement de l’excédent de TVA – Obligations de paiement supplémentaires – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité.#Affaire C-487/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0489: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Extinguishment of the customs debt – Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union – Seizure and confiscation – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Chargeable event – Chargeability.#Case C-489/20.