maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0462_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione (ASGI) and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento per le politiche della famiglia and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/109/EC – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Article 11 – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights of third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Directive 2009/50/EC – Rights of third-country nationals who hold an EU Blue Card – Article 14 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Rights of beneficiaries of international protection – Article 29 – Equal treatment – Social securi
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0463: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 24 février 2022.#Namur-Est Environnement ASBL contre Région wallonne.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2011/92/UE – Évaluation des incidences de certains projets sur l’environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels – Articulation entre la procédure d’évaluation et d’autorisation visée à l’article 2 de la directive 2011/92/UE et une procédure nationale de dérogation aux mesures de protection des espèces prévues par la directive 92/43/CEE – Notion d’“autorisation” – Processus décisionnel complexe – Obligation d’évaluation – Portée matérielle – Stade procédural auquel doit être garantie la participation du public au processus décisionnel.#Affaire C-463/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0463_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Relationship between the assessment and consent procedure referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU and a national procedure for derogation from the species protection measures provided for by Directive 92/43/EEC – Concept of ‘development consent’ – Multi-stage decision-making process – Obligation to conduct an assessment – Material scope – Stage of the procedure at which public participation in the decision-making process must be ensured.#Case C-463/20.
marec 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0464_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Appeal – Institutional law – Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) – Members of the contract staff – Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out in respect of the applicant – Reopening of the investigation – Compliance with the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 October 2018, KF v SatCen (T‑286/15, EU:T:2018:718) – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-464/20 P.
september 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0465: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#European Commission v Ireland and Apple Sales International.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax rulings issued by a Member State – Selective tax advantages – Allocation of profits generated by intellectual property licences to branches of non-resident companies – Arm’s length principle.#Case C-465/20 P.
september 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0465_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#European Commission v Ireland and Apple Sales International.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax rulings issued by a Member State – Selective tax advantages – Allocation of profits generated by intellectual property licences to branches of non-resident companies – Arm’s length principle.#Case C-465/20 P.
maj 19, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0466: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0466_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.
junij 08, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0468: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Fastweb SpA and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC et 2002/22/EC – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFUE – Freedom to provide services – National legislation granting the national regulatory authority the power to impose on telephony service providers a minimum time frame for the renewal of offers and a minimum time frame for billing – Consumer protection – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-468/20.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0468_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Fastweb SpA and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC et 2002/22/EC – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – National legislation granting the national regulatory authority the power to impose on telephony service providers a minimum time frame for the renewal of offers and a minimum time frame for billing – Consumer protection – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-468/20.