maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0373_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#A.M. v Dyrektor Z. Oddziału Regionalnego Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Szczecinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Common rules – Single payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ – Crop rotation – Natural periodic flooding of meadows and pastures situated in a special environmental protection area.#Case C-373/20.
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Control of concentrations of undertakings – Mobile telecommunications services – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market – Oligopolistic market – Significant impediment to effective competition – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters – Limits of judicial review – Guidelines on horizontal mergers – Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the parties to th
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0376_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Control of concentrations of undertakings – Mobile telecommunications services – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market – Oligopolistic market – Significant impediment to effective competition – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters – Limits of judicial review – Guidelines on horizontal mergers – Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition – Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ – Closeness of competition between the parties t
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 12. Mai 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA u.a. gegen Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato u.a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Beherrschende Stellung – Missbräuchliche Ausnutzung – Art. 102 AEUV – Auswirkung einer Praxis auf das Wohl der Verbraucher und die Marktstruktur – Missbräuchliche Verdrängungspraxis – Eignung der Praxis, eine Verdrängungswirkung zu entfalten – Einsatz von anderen Mitteln als denen eines Leistungswettbewerbs – Unmöglichkeit für einen hypothetischen ebenso effizienten Wettbewerber, die Praxis zu erwidern – Vorliegen einer wettbewerbswidrigen Absicht – Öffnung des Strommarkts für den Wettbewerb – Übermittlung geschäftlich sensibler Informationen innerhalb einer Unte This document does not exist in English.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0377_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Dominant position – Abuse – Article 102 TFEU – Effect of a practice on the well-being of consumers and on the structure of the market – Abusive exclusionary practice – Whether the practice is capable of producing an exclusionary effect – Recourse to means other than those coming within the scope of competition on the merits – Hypothetical as-efficient competitor unable to replicate the practice – Existence of an anticompetitive intent – Opening-up of the market for the sale of electricity to compet
maj 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0379_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#B v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Article 13 – Standstill clause – New restriction – Family reunification of minor children of Turkish workers – Age condition – Requirement of compelling reasons in order to be granted family reunification – Overriding reason in the public interest – Successful integration – Proportionality.#Case C-379/20.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#EL and TP v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence – Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair – National court's power of review of its own motion – National proceedings for taxation of costs – Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees.#Case C-385/20.
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0385_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#EL and TP v Caixabank SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence – Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair – National court’s power of review of its own motion – National proceedings for taxation of costs – Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees.#Case C-385/20.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0389: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 24. Februar 2022.#CJ gegen Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen im Bereich der sozialen Sicherheit – Richtlinie 79/7/EWG – Art. 4 Abs. 1 – Verbot jeglicher Diskriminierung aufgrund des Geschlechts – Hausangestellte – Schutz bei Arbeitslosigkeit – Ausschluss – Besonderer Nachteil für weibliche Beschäftigte – Legitime sozialpolitische Ziele – Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-389/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0389_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex – Domestic workers – Protection in respect of unemployment – Exclusion – Particular disadvantage to female workers – Legitimate social policy objectives – Proportionality.#Case C-389/20.