Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0354_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#L and P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Article 6(1) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ – Taking into consideration of developments after the European arrest warrant concerned has been issued – Obligation of the execut

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0357_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV(a) – European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) – Resting places and breeding sites – Deterioration or destruction.#Case C-357/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0360_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#Ministerul Lucrărilor Publice, Dezvoltării şi Administraţiei v NE.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Article 325 TFEU – Fight against fraud and other illegal activities – Convention on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Definition of ‘fraud’ – Unlawful conduct during the sustainability phase of a project.#Case C-360/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0362_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2021.#Openbaar Ministerie and Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV and Gosselin Forwarding Services NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commercial policy – Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 7307 11 10, 7307 19 10 and 7307 19 90 – Scope – Tariff classification resulting from a Court judgment – Definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron – Whether definitive anti-dumping duties are applicable on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of sp

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0364: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Declaration by the European Central Bank (ECB) that an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme – Lack of public interest – Winding up in accordance with national law – Shareholders – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case C-364/20 P.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0364_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Declaration by the European Central Bank (ECB) that an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme – Lack of public interest – Winding up in accordance with national law – Shareholders – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case C-364/20 P.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0368: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain of a penalty, a passport or identity card to be presented when the internal border c

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0368_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Free movement of persons – Regulation (EU) 2016/399 – Schengen Borders Code – Article 25(4) – Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months – National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded – Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the successive periods are based on the same threat or threats – National legislation requiring, on pain o

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0371_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, v Peek & Cloppenburg KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Commercial practices deemed to be unfair in all circumstances – Misleading commercial practices – First sentence of point 11 of Annex I – Advertising campaigns – Use of editorial content in the media to promote a product – Promotion financed by the trader itself – Concept of ‘payment’ – Promotion of sales of the products of the media operator company and of the trader – Advertorial.#Case C-371/20.

RSS
First869870871872874876877878Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top