marec 14, 2022 0 252 CELEX:62020CJ0106_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Case C-106/20 P.
april 11, 2022 0 226 CELEX:62020CJ0107_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Case C-107/20 P.
avgust 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0109_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 October 2021.#Republiken Polen v PL Holdings Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of the one part, and the Government of the People’s Republic of Poland, of the other, concerning the reciprocal promotion and protection of investments, signed on 19 May 1987 – Arbitration proceedings – Dispute between an investor from one Member State and another Member State – Arbitration clause provided for in that agreement contrary to EU law – Invalidity – Ad hoc arbitration agreement between the parties to that dispute – Participation in the arbitration proceedin
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0116: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 7. April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL gegen Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj und Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Landwirtschaft – Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik – Direktzahlungen – Gemeinsame Regeln – Regelung für die einheitliche Flächenzahlung – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 73/2009 – Art. 2 Buchst. c – Begriff ‚landwirtschaftliche Tätigkeit‘ – Art. 35 – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1122/2009 – Nationale Regelung, die die Vorlage eines Rechtstitels zum Nachweis des Rechts zur Nutzung der dem Betriebsinhaber durch Konzessionsvertrag zur Verfügung gestellten landwirtschaftlichen Parzelle verlangt und die Gültigkeit eines solchen Ve This document does not exist in English.
april 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0116_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 35 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the
marec 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0117: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Postal services – Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider – Fine imposed by a national postal regulator – Fine imposed by a national competition authority – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Duplication of proceedings and penalties – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-117/20.
avgust 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0117_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Postal services – Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider – Fine imposed by a national postal regulator – Fine imposed by a national competition authority – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Duplication of proceedings and penalties – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-117/20.
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0118_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#JY v Wiener Landesregierung.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Scope – Renunciation of the nationality of one Member State in order to obtain the nationality of another Member State in accordance with the assurance given by the latter to naturalise the person concerned – Revocation of that assurance on grounds of public policy or public security – Principle of proportionality – Statelessness.#Case C-118/20.
maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0119_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Līga Šenfelde v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding – National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Article 19(1)(a) – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Aid for the development of small farms – Cumulation of aid – Possibility to refuse the cumulation.#Case C-119/20.
maj 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0120_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Koleje Mazowieckie – KM Sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa – Minister Infrastruktury i Budownictwa obecnie Minister Infrastruktury i Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego and PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4(5) – Charging – Article 30 – National regulatory body tasked with ensuring that infrastructure charges comply with that directive – Contract for use of infrastructure concluded between the infrastructure manager and a railway undertaking – Incorrect transposition – State liability – Claim for damages – Prior referral to the nati