Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0525: Case C-525/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Association France Nature Environnement v Premier ministre, Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — Framework for European Union action in the field of water policy — Article 4(1)(a) — Environmental objectives relating to surface water — Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a programme or a project that may cause a deterioration of the status of a body of surface water — Concept of ‘deterioration’ of the status of a body of surface water — Article 4(6) and (7) — Derogations from the prohibition of deterioration — Conditions — Programme or p

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0530: Case C-530/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa — Latvia) — ‘EUROAPTIEKA’ SIA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 86(1) — Concept of ‘advertising of medicinal products’ — Article 87(3) — Rational use of medicinal products — Article 90 — Prohibited advertising methods — Advertising of medicinal products not subject to medical prescription and not reimbursed — Advertising by price — Advertising of promotional offers — Advertising of bundled sales — Prohibition)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0531: Case C-531/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 3 — General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Article 14 — Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ — Consultation of a patent lawyer — Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0532: Case C-532/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA, Strabag AG — Sucursala Bucureşti, Swietelsky AG Linz — Sucursala Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/13/EEC — Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors — Article 1(1) and (3) — Access to review procedures — Article 2c — Time limits for applying for review — Calculation — Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0533: Case C-533/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Labelling — Mandatory particulars — List of ingredients — Specific name of those ingredients — Addition of a vitamin to a food — Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin — No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0534: Case C-534/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — Leistritz AG v LH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Second sentence of Article 38(3) — Data protection officer — Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks — Legal basis — Article 16 TFEU — Requirement of functional independence — National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0536: Case C-536/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Tiketa’ UAB v M. Š. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/83/EU — Consumer contracts — Concept of ‘trader’ — Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts — Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0537: Case C-537/20, L Fund: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — L Fund v Finanzamt D (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Corporate income tax — Taxation of income from immovable property situated within the territory of a Member State — Difference in treatment between resident funds and non-resident funds — Exemption for resident funds only — Comparability of situations — Taking into account of the tax system of investors — None — Justification — Need to preserve the coherence of the national tax system — Need to preserve a balanced distribution of the power of taxation between Member States — None)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0538: Case C-538/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt B v W AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Articles 49 and 54 TFEU — Deduction of final losses incurred by a non-resident permanent establishment — State which has waived its power to impose taxes under a double taxation convention — Comparability of situations)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0541: Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Mobility package – Posting and working time) (Action for annulment – First package of mobility measures (Mobility Package) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of the drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to return every three or four weeks, depending on the case, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to begin and spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period – Prohibition on taking regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicl

RSS
First837838839840842844845846Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top