Search
× Search
Menu
    1. User Profile New
    2. Privacy policy
    1. Svetovanje - davčno materialno pravo
    2. Davčno svetovanje - davčno procesno pravo
    3. Svetovanje - Korporacijsko pravo
    4. Drugo mnenje v davčnih zadevah
    5. Izobraževanja iz davčnega, korporacijskega in povezanega prava podjetij
    1. Izvajanje storitev Računovodenja v Mreži Modro Poslovanje
    1. Kontakti TAXIN d.o.o. - Partner svetovalci za davčno in poslovno svetovanje
    2. TAXIN - PRICE LIST2024
    3. Kontakti MODRO JUTRO D.O.O. - Partner izvajalec računovodskih storitev
    1. Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....
    2. Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA
    3. mag. Derganc Franc BLOG
    1. WBN-info
    2. GGF Apartmani, GGF 4 YOU doživetje
    3. Pridružite se Svetovalcem in Izvajalcem mreže modro poslovanje
    4. Povpraševanje za računovodenje v Mreži modro poslovanje
    5. Želim analizo skladnosti poslovanja podjetij - 001MMP
    6. Želim storitev DRUGO MNENJE V DAVČNIH ZADEVAH oz. davčni ali poslovni nasvet
    7. Dogodki Modro Poslovanje

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

BAZA ZNANJA
0 0

CELEX:62020CA0447: Joined Cases C-447/20 and C-448/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LM (C-447/20), BD, Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-448/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Own resources of the European Union — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Proceedings relating to irregularities — Article 4 — Adoption of administrative measures — Article 3(1) — Limitation period for proceedings — Expiry — Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure — Article 3(2) — Period for implementation — Applicability — Starting poin

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0449: Zadeva C-449/20: Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 9. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugalska) – Real Vida Seguros SA/Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Predhodno odločanje – Obdavčenje – Člen 63 PDEU – Prosti pretok kapitala – Davek od dohodkov – Dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na borzi – Davčna ugodnost, ki velja za dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na nacionalnem borznem trgu – Različno obravnavanje – Objektivno razlikovalno merilo – Omejitev – Člen 65 PDEU – Objektivno primerljiva položaja – Upravičenost – Povsem gospodarski cilj)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0449: Zadeva C-449/20: Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 9. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugalska) – Real Vida Seguros SA/Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Predhodno odločanje – Obdavčenje – Člen 63 PDEU – Prosti pretok kapitala – Davek od dohodkov – Dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na borzi – Davčna ugodnost, ki velja za dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na nacionalnem borznem trgu – Različno obravnavanje – Objektivno razlikovalno merilo – Omejitev – Člen 65 PDEU – Objektivno primerljiva položaja – Upravičenost – Povsem gospodarski cilj)

CELEX:62020CA0449: Zadeva C-449/20: Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 9. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugalska) – Real Vida Seguros SA/Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Predhodno odločanje – Obdavčenje – Člen 63 PDEU – Prosti pretok kapitala – Davek od dohodkov – Dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na borzi – Davčna ugodnost, ki velja za dividende na podlagi delnic, ki kotirajo na nacionalnem borznem trgu – Različno obravnavanje – Objektivno razlikovalno merilo – Omejitev – Člen 65 PDEU – Objektivno primerljiva položaja – Upravičenost – Povsem gospodarski cilj)
0 0

CELEX:62020CA0451: Case C-451/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 3(1) — Scope — Flight with connecting flight departing from and arriving in a third country — Single reservation through a Community air carrier — Stopover in the territory of a Member State — Article 5(1)(c)(iii) and Article 7 — Delayed alternative flight — Taking into account of the actual arrival time for the purposes of compensation)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0452: Case C-452/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2014/40/EU — Article 23(3) — World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control — Prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors — Rules on penalties — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties — Obligation on sellers of tobacco products to verify the buyer’s age when selling those products — Fine — Operation of a tobacconist’s shop — Suspension of trading licence for a period of 15 days — Principle of proportiona

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0453: Case C-453/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře — Czech Republic) — CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFUE — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body — Exercise of judicial or administrative functions — Directive 2012/34/EU — Articles 55 and 56 — Single national regulatory body for the railway sector — Independent regulatory authority for the sector — Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis — Power to impose penalties — Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0459: Case C-459/20, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Thai mother of a Dutch minor): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Utrecht — Netherlands) — X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Citizenship of the Union — Article 20 TFEU — Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Decision of a Member State refusing residence to a third-country national parent of a minor child, who has the nationality of that Member State — Child living outside the territory of the European Union and never having resided in its territory)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0460: Case C-460/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — TU, RE v Google LLC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Directive 95/46/EC — Article 12(b) — Point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 14 — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 17(3)(a) — Operator of an internet search engine — Research carried out on the basis of a person’s name — Displaying a link to articles containing allegedly inaccurate information in the list of search results — Displaying, in the form of thumbnails, photographs illustrating those articles in the list of results of an image search — Request for de-referencing made to the ope

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0461: Case C-461/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 72 — Modification of contracts during their term — Transfer of a framework agreement — New contractor assuming on the insolvency of the initial contractor the rights and obligations attributed to the latter under a framework agreement — Whether need for a new procurement procedure)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0463: Case C-463/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Relationship between the assessment and consent procedure referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU and a national procedure of derogation from the species protection measures provided for in Directive 92/43/EEC — Concept of ‘consent’ — Complex decision-making process — Obligation to conduct an assessment — Material scope — Procedural stage at which public participation in the deci

RSS
First833834835836838840841842Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top