Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0179: Case C-179/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Fondul Proprietatea SA v Guvernul României, SC Complexul Energetic Hunedoara SA, in liquidation, SC Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA and Compania Naţională de Transport al Energiei Electrice ‘Transelectrica’ SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 15(4) — Priority dispatch — Security of supply — Article 32(1) — Free third-party access — Guaranteed access to transmission systems — Directive 2009/28/EC — Article 16(2) — Guaranteed access — Article 107(1) TFEU — Article 108(3) TFEU — State aid)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0181: Case C-181/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud — Czech Republic) — VYSOČINA WIND a.s. v Česká republika — Ministerstvo životního prostředí (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2012/19/EU — Waste electrical and electronic equipment — Obligation to finance the costs relating to the management of waste from photovoltaic panels — Retroactive effect — Principle of legal certainty — Incorrect transposition of a directive — Liability of the Member State)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0184: Case C-184/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8 and 52(1) — Directive 95/46/EC — Article 7(c) — Article 8(1) — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 6(3) — Article 9(1) — Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject — Objective of public interest — Proportionality — Processing of special categories

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0186: Zadeva C-186/20: Sodba Sodišča (deseti senat) z dne 30. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovaška) – HYDINA SK s.r.o./Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Predhodno odločanje – Upravno sodelovanje in boj proti goljufijam na področju davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Uredba (EU) št. 904/2010 – Členi od 10 do 12 – Izmenjava informacij – Davčni nadzor – Roki – Prekinitev davčnega nadzora v primeru izmenjave informacij – Prekoračitev roka, določenega za posredovanje informacij – Vpliv na zakonitost prekinitve davčnega nadzora)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0186: Zadeva C-186/20: Sodba Sodišča (deseti senat) z dne 30. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovaška) – HYDINA SK s.r.o./Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Predhodno odločanje – Upravno sodelovanje in boj proti goljufijam na področju davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Uredba (EU) št. 904/2010 – Členi od 10 do 12 – Izmenjava informacij – Davčni nadzor – Roki – Prekinitev davčnega nadzora v primeru izmenjave informacij – Prekoračitev roka, določenega za posredovanje informacij – Vpliv na zakonitost prekinitve davčnega nadzora)

CELEX:62020CA0186: Zadeva C-186/20: Sodba Sodišča (deseti senat) z dne 30. septembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovaška) – HYDINA SK s.r.o./Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Predhodno odločanje – Upravno sodelovanje in boj proti goljufijam na področju davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Uredba (EU) št. 904/2010 – Členi od 10 do 12 – Izmenjava informacij – Davčni nadzor – Roki – Prekinitev davčnega nadzora v primeru izmenjave informacij – Prekoračitev roka, določenega za posredovanje informacij – Vpliv na zakonitost prekinitve davčnega nadzora)
0 0

CELEX:62020CA0203: Case C-203/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava III — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against AB and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Scope — Article 51 — Implementation of EU law — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Jurisdiction of the Court — Reference made before the issue of a European arrest warrant — Admissibility — Principle ne bis in idem — Article 50 — Concepts of ‘acquittal’ and ‘conviction’ — Amnesty in the issuing Member State — Final decision discontinuing a criminal prosecution — Revocation of the amnesty — Setting-aside of the decisio

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0204: Case C-204/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH v kohlpharma GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Article 10(2) — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Article 15 — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Sa

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0211: Zaak C-211/20 P: Arrest van het Hof (Eerste kamer) van 10 november 2022 — Europese Commissie / Valencia Club de Fútbol SAD, Koninkrijk Spanje [Hogere voorziening – Staatssteun – Staatsgarantie die door een overheidsinstantie wordt verleend – Leningen aan drie voetbalclubs van de autonome gemeenschap Valencia (Valencia CF, Hércules CF en Elche CF) – Besluit waarbij de steun onverenigbaar met de interne markt wordt verklaard – Nietigverklaring van het besluit voor zover dit betrekking heeft op Valencia CF – Begrip “voordeel” – Beoordeling van het bestaan van een voordeel – Garantiemededeling – Uitlegging – Zorgvuldigheidsplicht van de Europese Commissie – Bewijslast – Onjuiste opvatting]

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0217: Case C-217/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Overijssel — Netherlands) — XXXX v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Protection of the health and safety of workers — Article 7(1) — Right to paid annual leave — Level of remuneration — Reduced remuneration due to incapacity for work)

RSS
First824825826827829831832833Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top