november 01, 2025 0 21 CELEX:62018TO0414(04)_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Case T-414/18.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0422_RES: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State — Documents originating from the applicant — Application for access by a third party — Initial decision to grant access in part — Lack of purpose — Inadmissibility.#Case T-422/18.
september 04, 2024 0 35 CELEX:62018TO0481_RES: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 April 2019.#Electroquimica Onubense, SL v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-481/18.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0530_RES: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Romania v European Commission.#Actions for annulment — EAGF and EAFRD — Commission Implementing Decision — Notification to the addressee — Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union — Period within which proceedings must be commenced — Point from which time starts to run — Out of time — Inadmissibility.#Case T-530/18.
junij 20, 2022 0 169 CELEX:62018TO0540: Rectification order of 13 June 2022.#ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-540/18.
september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0574_RES: Order of the President of the General Court of 21 January 2019 (Extracts).#Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. v European Commission.#Application for interim measures — Plant-protection products — Active substance oxasulfuron — Non-renewal of approval for placing on the market — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency — Balancing of interests.#Case T-574/18 R.
avgust 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0599: Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 10 octobre 2019.#Aeris Invest Sàrl contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Recours en annulation – Politique économique et monétaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement – Dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Absence de valorisation définitive ex post de Banco Popular Español – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-599/18. This document does not exist in English.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0630_RES: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#OP v European Commission.#Legal aid — Application made before an action has been brought — Financial situation — Insufficient information and supporting documents — Dismissal of application.#Case T-630/18 AJ.
avgust 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0660_RES: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2019.#VodafoneZiggo Group BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility.#Case T-660/18.
avgust 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TO0748(01)_RES: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Registered Community design representing pneumatic power tools — Invalidity proceedings –– Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Expiry of the time limit within which to intervene under Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under that provision — Application, in the alternative, for leave to intervene under Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure made within the time limit — Whether permissible.#Case T-748/18.