Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0723_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 March 2021.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – Certification procedure – Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Communication by registered letter – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Registered letter not collected by the person to whom it was addressed – Starting point of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Rules on the use of languages.#Case T-723/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0724_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Earlier EU word mark AUREA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Correction of the Board of Appeal’s decision — Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-724/18 and T-184/19.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0737_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#Siberia Oriental BV v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant variety rights — Application for amendment of the date of expiry of the Community protection of plant variety rights in respect of the Siberia variety of the species Lilium L. — Appeal before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO — Inadmissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Effective judicial protection — Article 67(1) and Article 87 of Regulation No 2100/94 — Correction of patent mistakes — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.#Case T-737/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0740: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0740_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0745_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (Extracts).#Covestro Deutschland AG v European Commission.#State aid – State aid scheme implemented by Germany in favour of certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-745/18.

0 0

CELEX:62018TJ0757_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 19 janvier 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Casinos grecs – Régime prévoyant une charge de 80 % sur des droits d’entrée de montants différents – Différenciation entre les casinos publics et privés – Plainte – Décision déclarant l’aide incompatible avec le marché intérieur et illégale et ordonnant sa récupération – Annulation de la décision par un arrêt du Tribunal – Décision constatant l’absence d’aide d’État – Recours en annulation – Acte attaquable – Recevabilité – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-757/18.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First757758759760762764765766Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top