avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0310_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 October 2019.#European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission.#Social policy — Dialogue between the social partners at EU level — Agreement entitled ‘General framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations’ — Joint request of the signatory parties seeking the implementation of that agreement at EU level — Refusal by the Commission to submit a proposal for a decision to the Council — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Commission’s discretion — Autonomy of the social partners — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality.#Case T-310/18.
februar 17, 2022 0 296 CELEX:62018TJ0328: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission.#Case T-328/18.
februar 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0328_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 8 septembre 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, anciennement Gas Natural SDG, SA contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Mesure d’incitation environnementale adoptée par l’Espagne en faveur des centrales au charbon – Décision d’ouvrir la procédure prévue à l’article 108, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Caractère sélectif.#Affaire T-328/18. This document does not exist in English.
julij 06, 2022 0 171 CELEX:62018TJ0335_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.
avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0337_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG v European Commission.#Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard.#Cases T-337/18 and T-347/18.
avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0341_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Nec Corp. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by its subsidiary – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Gravity of the infringement – Increase in the amount of the fine for repeated infringement – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-341/18.
avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0342_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Nichicon Corporation v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Concerted practice – Exchanges of sensitive business information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Restriction of competition by object – Statement of objections – Point 13 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Single and continuous infringe
avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0343_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Tokin Corp. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Statement of objections – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances.#Case T-343/18.
avgust 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0344_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Rubycon Corp. and Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Fines – Partial immunity from fines – Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice – Reduction in the amount of the fine – Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Ceiling of 10% of turnover – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-344/18.
avgust 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0351_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 October 2021.#Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC and Versobank AS v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Breach of legislation on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism – Admissibility – Powers of the national competent authorities (NCAs) of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Misuse of powers – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-351/18 and T-584/1